Biomechanical And Musculoskeletal Characteristics In Child And Adult Bharatanatyam Dancers

Bharatanatyam is a classical Indian dance that involves high impact movements. Knowledge of injury prevalence, musculoskeletal, and biomechanical characteristics of Bharatanatyam dancers can help educate dancers about injury prevention and rehabilitation. PURPOSE: To compare biomechanical and musculoskeletal factors associated with injury in Bharatanatyam dancers. METHODS: Data for range of motion (ROM), strength, forces, and accelerations were collected on 8 female dancers: 4 children (8-9 years old) and 4 adults: (19-52 years old). For ROM and strength, goniometry and handheld dynamometers were used. Data was analyzed with Excel software. ROM and strength measurements were compared between children and adults. Forces and accelerations were collected using insole sensors and inertial measurement as dancers performed 4 tasks: 2 minute walk, 3 countermovement jumps, 3 minute dance practice, and 5 minute full dance routine. Peak vertical force and acceleration were calculated for each task and compared between children and adults for dominant and non-dominant foot. A 1-way repeated measures ANOVA comparing biomechanical assessments during tasks and descriptive statistics comparing children to adults were used. RESULTS: 1 dancer reported a prior injury; none were currently injured. Children reported 2.8 ± 0.8 years of formal dance training and adults reported 20.6 ± 13.5 years. Dancers generated higher peak forces and accelerations with dance practice steps and full dance routines as high as with countermovement jump and much higher than with walking. Peak forces and accelerations (normalized to body weight) for the dominant foot were higher in children for all movements. Children were stronger in all motions when normalized to body weight. CONCLUSION: Data indicated dance practice and full dance routines produced high peak forces and accelerations comparable to countermovement jumps. Younger dancers produced higher normalized forces than adults. - Dominant Foot Non-dominant Foot Walking Jumping Dance Practice Full Dance Walking Jumping Dance Practice Full Dance Peak Vertical Force (NBW) Overall 1.4 ± 0.4 3.0 ± 1.1 2.0 ± 0.5 2.3 ± 0.9 1.3 ± 0.3 2.6 ± 1.1 2.0 ± 0.6 2.0 ± 0.5 Adults 1.2 ± 0.1 2.1 ± 0.4 1.8 ± 0.5 2.2 ± 1.3 1.1 ± 0.1 1.8 ± 0.4 1.7 ± 0.3 1.6 ± 0.3 Children 1.7 ± 0.5 3.9 ± 0.8 2.3 ± 0.4 2.4 ± 0.2 1.6 ± 0.3 3.4 ± 1.1 2.4 ± 0.6 2.4 ± 0.3 Peak Acceleration (g) Overall 10.2 ± 3.8 31.9 ± 10.1 34.0 ± 7.9 33.4 ± 8.6 8.8 ± 3.6 29.7 ± 15.3 34.6 ± 8.3 33.2 ± 10.5 Adults 7.4 ± 2.8 23.5 ± 5.7 36.9 ± 9.8 31.2 ± 11.4 6.2 ± 1.2 20.0 ± 5.0 36.3 ± 6.3 27.9 ± 7.4 Children 13.0 ± 2.2 40.3 ± 5.6 31.2 ± 3.7 35.6 ± 2.7 11.4 ± 3.3 39.5 ± 15.9 32.8 ± 9.6 38.5 ± 10.5 Elon Faculty and Research Development Funds

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001061316.22859.29
Primary Topic
Diversity and Impact of Dance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biomechanical And Musculoskeletal Characteristics In Child And Adult Bharatanatyam Dancers

Ann Heil, Srikant Vallabhajosula, Kelly O'Daniel, Virginia Shafer et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Diversity and Impact of Dance
article

Biomechanical And Musculoskeletal Characteristics In Child And Adult Bharatanatyam Dancers

Ann Heil, Srikant Vallabhajosula, Kelly O'Daniel, Virginia Shafer, Danielle Essex, John Magill, Kaleigh Jenkins
article en

Abstract

Bharatanatyam is a classical Indian dance that involves high impact movements. Knowledge of injury prevalence, musculoskeletal, and biomechanical characteristics of Bharatanatyam dancers can help educate dancers about injury prevention and rehabilitation. PURPOSE: To compare biomechanical and musculoskeletal factors associated with injury in Bharatanatyam dancers. METHODS: Data for range of motion (ROM), strength, forces, and accelerations were collected on 8 female dancers: 4 children (8-9 years old) and 4 adults: (19-52 years old). For ROM and strength, goniometry and handheld dynamometers were used. Data was analyzed with Excel software. ROM and strength measurements were compared between children and adults. Forces and accelerations were collected using insole sensors and inertial measurement as dancers performed 4 tasks: 2 minute walk, 3 countermovement jumps, 3 minute dance practice, and 5 minute full dance routine. Peak vertical force and acceleration were calculated for each task and compared between children and adults for dominant and non-dominant foot. A 1-way repeated measures ANOVA comparing biomechanical assessments during tasks and descriptive statistics comparing children to adults were used. RESULTS: 1 dancer reported a prior injury; none were currently injured. Children reported 2.8 ± 0.8 years of formal dance training and adults reported 20.6 ± 13.5 years. Dancers generated higher peak forces and accelerations with dance practice steps and full dance routines as high as with countermovement jump and much higher than with walking. Peak forces and accelerations (normalized to body weight) for the dominant foot were higher in children for all movements. Children were stronger in all motions when normalized to body weight. CONCLUSION: Data indicated dance practice and full dance routines produced high peak forces and accelerations comparable to countermovement jumps. Younger dancers produced higher normalized forces than adults. - Dominant Foot Non-dominant Foot Walking Jumping Dance Practice Full Dance Walking Jumping Dance Practice Full Dance Peak Vertical Force (NBW) Overall 1.4 ± 0.4 3.0 ± 1.1 2.0 ± 0.5 2.3 ± 0.9 1.3 ± 0.3 2.6 ± 1.1 2.0 ± 0.6 2.0 ± 0.5 Adults 1.2 ± 0.1 2.1 ± 0.4 1.8 ± 0.5 2.2 ± 1.3 1.1 ± 0.1 1.8 ± 0.4 1.7 ± 0.3 1.6 ± 0.3 Children 1.7 ± 0.5 3.9 ± 0.8 2.3 ± 0.4 2.4 ± 0.2 1.6 ± 0.3 3.4 ± 1.1 2.4 ± 0.6 2.4 ± 0.3 Peak Acceleration (g) Overall 10.2 ± 3.8 31.9 ± 10.1 34.0 ± 7.9 33.4 ± 8.6 8.8 ± 3.6 29.7 ± 15.3 34.6 ± 8.3 33.2 ± 10.5 Adults 7.4 ± 2.8 23.5 ± 5.7 36.9 ± 9.8 31.2 ± 11.4 6.2 ± 1.2 20.0 ± 5.0 36.3 ± 6.3 27.9 ± 7.4 Children 13.0 ± 2.2 40.3 ± 5.6 31.2 ± 3.7 35.6 ± 2.7 11.4 ± 3.3 39.5 ± 15.9 32.8 ± 9.6 38.5 ± 10.5 Elon Faculty and Research Development Funds

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Elon University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Diversity and Impact of Dance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.