Mapping The Youth Physical Activity System In A Midwest 6-county Region

PURPOSE: We created an ‘Ecosystem Map’ to understand the system of organizations and programs associated with physical activity for children and youth in the 6-county Kansas City region. METHODS: Snowball sampling was used to recruit a sample of youth physical activity agencies. Further contacts were elicited from participating agencies. Research staff collected the following data using publicly available program descriptions and 1-on-1 interviews with organizational staff: funding source, program mission (education, public health, etc.), geographic location served, age group served, income level served, program function (policy, direct-to-client services, system monitoring, etc.), and socio-ecological level of action/intervention (individual level, macro level, etc.). RESULTS: As of 11/2023, we have identified 105 individual organizations providing 987 programs. We estimate we have identified 65% of all organizations and programs at this time, with assessment to be completed by 1/31/2024. Of the presently identified organizations, 56% are governmental (e.g., Parks and Recreation), 20% are non-profit (e.g., Boys and Girls Clubs), and 16% are for-profit (e.g., fitness centers). Ninety-eight percent provide direct programming to children and youth, whereas 1% provide policy-level services. Programming exists for all age categories; 258 for children 0-4 years, 744 for children 5-11 years, 700 for youth 12-14 years, and 624 for youth 15-18 years (programs can be counted in multiple age categories so the sum will not equal 987). Smaller numbers of programs exist for special populations: 57 for developmentally disabled youth, 58 for youth with a physical disability, and 51 available for youth with mental health issues. Nearly all (916/987) charge a participation fee, and 9% provide scholarships. CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary findings suggest that the existing youth physical activity ecosystem is overwhelmingly focused on fee-based programs (e.g., sports leagues), with a small number providing scholarships, suggesting a lack of equitable opportunities for Kansas City youth. A lack of organizations providing policy-level services currently exists in the systems. These findings describe system-level opportunities to increase equitable access to youth physical activity programs in the region. University of Kansas Medical Center Frontiers Clinical and Translational Science Institute

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001060424.21709.d1
Primary Topic
Youth Development and Social Support
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping The Youth Physical Activity System In A Midwest 6-county Region

Natalie J. Updyke, Robin Shook
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Youth Development and Social Support
article

Mapping The Youth Physical Activity System In A Midwest 6-county Region

Natalie J. Updyke, Robin Shook
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: We created an ‘Ecosystem Map’ to understand the system of organizations and programs associated with physical activity for children and youth in the 6-county Kansas City region. METHODS: Snowball sampling was used to recruit a sample of youth physical activity agencies. Further contacts were elicited from participating agencies. Research staff collected the following data using publicly available program descriptions and 1-on-1 interviews with organizational staff: funding source, program mission (education, public health, etc.), geographic location served, age group served, income level served, program function (policy, direct-to-client services, system monitoring, etc.), and socio-ecological level of action/intervention (individual level, macro level, etc.). RESULTS: As of 11/2023, we have identified 105 individual organizations providing 987 programs. We estimate we have identified 65% of all organizations and programs at this time, with assessment to be completed by 1/31/2024. Of the presently identified organizations, 56% are governmental (e.g., Parks and Recreation), 20% are non-profit (e.g., Boys and Girls Clubs), and 16% are for-profit (e.g., fitness centers). Ninety-eight percent provide direct programming to children and youth, whereas 1% provide policy-level services. Programming exists for all age categories; 258 for children 0-4 years, 744 for children 5-11 years, 700 for youth 12-14 years, and 624 for youth 15-18 years (programs can be counted in multiple age categories so the sum will not equal 987). Smaller numbers of programs exist for special populations: 57 for developmentally disabled youth, 58 for youth with a physical disability, and 51 available for youth with mental health issues. Nearly all (916/987) charge a participation fee, and 9% provide scholarships. CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary findings suggest that the existing youth physical activity ecosystem is overwhelmingly focused on fee-based programs (e.g., sports leagues), with a small number providing scholarships, suggesting a lack of equitable opportunities for Kansas City youth. A lack of organizations providing policy-level services currently exists in the systems. These findings describe system-level opportunities to increase equitable access to youth physical activity programs in the region. University of Kansas Medical Center Frontiers Clinical and Translational Science Institute

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Children's Mercy Hospital (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Youth Development and Social Support
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.