Examination Of Energy Availability, Eating Disorder Risk, Carbohydrate Availability Among Collegiate Rotc Cadets

Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) cadets are tactical athletes and may be at risk for low energy availability (LEA), eating disorders (ED), and low carbohydrate (CHO) availability. PURPOSE: To examine LEA with or without an ED risk and LEA with or without a low CHO availability in ROTC cadets across sex. METHODS: Twenty-eight ROTC cadets (age: 19.5 ± 2.7 years; females = 13, height: 161.9 ± 7.2 cm, weight: 62.3 ± 9.4 kg; males = 15, height: 176.7 ± 6.8 cm, weight: 77.1 ± 10.6 kg) completed baseline measures including: anthropometric measurements (height, mass, body composition), resting metabolic rate, the Eating Disorder Inventory-3 (EDI-3), and the EDI-3 Symptom Checklist (EDI-3 SC). Energy intake, total daily energy expenditure, and exercise energy expenditure were estimated using a 7-day dietary log and a heart rate monitor. LEA was defined as <30 kcal/kg of fat-free mass (FFM) per day. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all demographics and dependent variables. Chi-squares and crosstabulations analysis were used to examine differences in sex for ED risk, and LEA both with or without ED risk and with or without low CHO availability. RESULTS: Overall, 60.7% (n = 17/28) of ROTC cadets presented with LEA, 57.1% (n = 16) with ED risk , and 89.3% (n = 25/28) with Low CHO intake. Additionally, of those with LEA, 70.6% (n = 12) displayed LEA with ED risk, and 100% (n = 17) LEA with Low CHO intake. No significant differences were found across sex and LEA (p = .934), ED risk (p = .229), and Low CHO intake (p = .630). Table1 represents energy needs of ROTC Cadets. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of LEA was present in over half of the ROTC cadets in this sample. Alarmingly, those with LEA also presented with risk for EDs and low CHO intake. Dietary intake was inadequate for the demands of the physical activities performed. Nutritional interventions and educational strategies should be implemented among ROTC to assists in prevention and early identification of negative health outcomes. - Energy Needs for Female and Male ROTC Cadets Energy Needs All Females Males P-Value Resting Metabolic Rate (kcals) 1540.7 ± 364.0 1283.8 ± 204.2 1763.3 ± 324.7 <.001 Energy Intake (kcals) 1992.9 ± 616.1 1602.7 ± 411.9 2330.9 ± 568.1 <.001 Total Daily Energy Expenditure (kcals) 3158.3 ± 779.2 2527.3 ± 377.5 3705.3 ± 598.7 <.001 Exercise Energy Expenditure (kcals) 465.7 ± 209.6 371.7 ± 248.2 547.1 ± 128.9 .024 Energy Availability (kcals/kg FFM/day) 31.2 ± 17.6 28.8 ± 14.8 33.3 ± 19.9 .510

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001055804.42940.5d
Primary Topic
Wind and Air Flow Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examination Of Energy Availability, Eating Disorder Risk, Carbohydrate Availability Among Collegiate Rotc Cadets

Dawn M. Emerson, Toni M. Torres-McGehee, Nancy A. Uriegas, Kenya Moore et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Wind and Air Flow Studies
article

Examination Of Energy Availability, Eating Disorder Risk, Carbohydrate Availability Among Collegiate Rotc Cadets

Dawn M. Emerson, Toni M. Torres-McGehee, Nancy A. Uriegas, Kenya Moore, Erin Moore, Jillian Zerbe, Tristen Briggs
article en

Abstract

Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) cadets are tactical athletes and may be at risk for low energy availability (LEA), eating disorders (ED), and low carbohydrate (CHO) availability. PURPOSE: To examine LEA with or without an ED risk and LEA with or without a low CHO availability in ROTC cadets across sex. METHODS: Twenty-eight ROTC cadets (age: 19.5 ± 2.7 years; females = 13, height: 161.9 ± 7.2 cm, weight: 62.3 ± 9.4 kg; males = 15, height: 176.7 ± 6.8 cm, weight: 77.1 ± 10.6 kg) completed baseline measures including: anthropometric measurements (height, mass, body composition), resting metabolic rate, the Eating Disorder Inventory-3 (EDI-3), and the EDI-3 Symptom Checklist (EDI-3 SC). Energy intake, total daily energy expenditure, and exercise energy expenditure were estimated using a 7-day dietary log and a heart rate monitor. LEA was defined as <30 kcal/kg of fat-free mass (FFM) per day. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all demographics and dependent variables. Chi-squares and crosstabulations analysis were used to examine differences in sex for ED risk, and LEA both with or without ED risk and with or without low CHO availability. RESULTS: Overall, 60.7% (n = 17/28) of ROTC cadets presented with LEA, 57.1% (n = 16) with ED risk , and 89.3% (n = 25/28) with Low CHO intake. Additionally, of those with LEA, 70.6% (n = 12) displayed LEA with ED risk, and 100% (n = 17) LEA with Low CHO intake. No significant differences were found across sex and LEA (p = .934), ED risk (p = .229), and Low CHO intake (p = .630). Table1 represents energy needs of ROTC Cadets. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of LEA was present in over half of the ROTC cadets in this sample. Alarmingly, those with LEA also presented with risk for EDs and low CHO intake. Dietary intake was inadequate for the demands of the physical activities performed. Nutritional interventions and educational strategies should be implemented among ROTC to assists in prevention and early identification of negative health outcomes. - Energy Needs for Female and Male ROTC Cadets Energy Needs All Females Males P-Value Resting Metabolic Rate (kcals) 1540.7 ± 364.0 1283.8 ± 204.2 1763.3 ± 324.7 <.001 Energy Intake (kcals) 1992.9 ± 616.1 1602.7 ± 411.9 2330.9 ± 568.1 <.001 Total Daily Energy Expenditure (kcals) 3158.3 ± 779.2 2527.3 ± 377.5 3705.3 ± 598.7 <.001 Exercise Energy Expenditure (kcals) 465.7 ± 209.6 371.7 ± 248.2 547.1 ± 128.9 .024 Energy Availability (kcals/kg FFM/day) 31.2 ± 17.6 28.8 ± 14.8 33.3 ± 19.9 .510

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
University of South Carolina (US), University of Virginia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Wind and Air Flow Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.