Examining If The Occupational Heat Stress Recommendations Prevent Core Temperature From Exceeding 38.0 °C.

Heat stress recommendations aim to maintain core temperature (TC) below 38.0 °C in unacclimatized workers. In this secondary analysis, we assessed the recommendations when: 1) work-rest ratios are adjusted based on wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) at a fixed rate of metabolic heat production (Hprod) and 2) Hprod is adjusted based on WBGT at a fixed work-rest ratio. We compared this to non-compliant trials that either violated WBGT exposure or work intensity limits. PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that adhering to occupational heat stress recommendations will prevent TC from exceeding 38.0 °C despite differences in WBGT, Hprod, and work-rest ratios. METHODS: Unacclimated men and women completed 4-hour (half workday) exposures at a fixed WBGT, Hprod, and work-rest ratio. There were six iterations of Compliant Trials (n = 72 total observations; A: 24.1 °C, 431 W, 60:0 min; B: 26.6 °C, 461 W, 45:15 min; C: 28.4 °C, 462 W, 30:30 min; D: 29.7, 453 W, 15:45 min; E: 27.3 °C, 412 W, 30:30 min; F: 31.6 °C, 290 W, 30:30 min) and two iterations of Non-compliant Trials (n = 24 total observations; G: 36.1 °C, 453 W, 15:45 min; H: 31.7 °C, 410 W, 30:30 min). All subjects were provided 237 mL of sport drink every 15 min and drank ad libitum.Peak TC during the 4-hour exposure is reported. Individual TC responses were fit using linear regression and the resulting equation was utilized to predict peak TC occurring during an 8-hour exposure (i.e., a full workday). RESULTS: Peak TC was lower in the Compliant Trials (37.9 ± 0.3 °C) compared to Non-compliant Trials (38.7 ± 0.5 °C; p < 0.01) and was less than 38.0 °C in 56% of Compliant Trial observations, whereas peak TC exceeded 38.0 °C in all Non-compliant Trials. Peak TC was lower than the hypothetical peak TC of 38.0 °C (p = 0.04). Conversely, the prediction of peak TC during an 8-hour exposure revealed that most Compliant Trials (70%) would exceed a peak TC of 38.0 °C (p < 0.01). However, estimated peak TC remained lower in the Compliant Trials (38.2 ± 0.5 °C) compared to Non-compliant Trials (40.3 ± 1.9 °C; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In the 4-hour exposures, peak TC did not exceed 38.0 °C in the majority of occupational heat stress recommendation compliant trials. However, predicted peak TC exceeded 38.0 °C at 8 hours in most trials, albeit at a lower incidence than non-compliant trials. R01OH011528

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001061728.69461.8b
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining If The Occupational Heat Stress Recommendations Prevent Core Temperature From Exceeding 38.0 °C.

Erica Tourula, Roger S. Zoh, M. Jo Hite, Macie L. Tarr et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Climate Change and Health Impacts
article

Examining If The Occupational Heat Stress Recommendations Prevent Core Temperature From Exceeding 38.0 °C.

Erica Tourula, Roger S. Zoh, M. Jo Hite, Macie L. Tarr, Hayden W. Hess, Blair D. Johnson, Zachary J. Schlader, David Hostler, Molly Heikkinen
article en

Abstract

Heat stress recommendations aim to maintain core temperature (TC) below 38.0 °C in unacclimatized workers. In this secondary analysis, we assessed the recommendations when: 1) work-rest ratios are adjusted based on wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) at a fixed rate of metabolic heat production (Hprod) and 2) Hprod is adjusted based on WBGT at a fixed work-rest ratio. We compared this to non-compliant trials that either violated WBGT exposure or work intensity limits. PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that adhering to occupational heat stress recommendations will prevent TC from exceeding 38.0 °C despite differences in WBGT, Hprod, and work-rest ratios. METHODS: Unacclimated men and women completed 4-hour (half workday) exposures at a fixed WBGT, Hprod, and work-rest ratio. There were six iterations of Compliant Trials (n = 72 total observations; A: 24.1 °C, 431 W, 60:0 min; B: 26.6 °C, 461 W, 45:15 min; C: 28.4 °C, 462 W, 30:30 min; D: 29.7, 453 W, 15:45 min; E: 27.3 °C, 412 W, 30:30 min; F: 31.6 °C, 290 W, 30:30 min) and two iterations of Non-compliant Trials (n = 24 total observations; G: 36.1 °C, 453 W, 15:45 min; H: 31.7 °C, 410 W, 30:30 min). All subjects were provided 237 mL of sport drink every 15 min and drank ad libitum.Peak TC during the 4-hour exposure is reported. Individual TC responses were fit using linear regression and the resulting equation was utilized to predict peak TC occurring during an 8-hour exposure (i.e., a full workday). RESULTS: Peak TC was lower in the Compliant Trials (37.9 ± 0.3 °C) compared to Non-compliant Trials (38.7 ± 0.5 °C; p < 0.01) and was less than 38.0 °C in 56% of Compliant Trial observations, whereas peak TC exceeded 38.0 °C in all Non-compliant Trials. Peak TC was lower than the hypothetical peak TC of 38.0 °C (p = 0.04). Conversely, the prediction of peak TC during an 8-hour exposure revealed that most Compliant Trials (70%) would exceed a peak TC of 38.0 °C (p < 0.01). However, estimated peak TC remained lower in the Compliant Trials (38.2 ± 0.5 °C) compared to Non-compliant Trials (40.3 ± 1.9 °C; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In the 4-hour exposures, peak TC did not exceed 38.0 °C in the majority of occupational heat stress recommendation compliant trials. However, predicted peak TC exceeded 38.0 °C at 8 hours in most trials, albeit at a lower incidence than non-compliant trials. R01OH011528

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Indiana University Bloomington (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.