Examining Gender Norms Of Body Image And Eating Behavior In NCAA Student-Athletes

Lean sports, like gymnastics and endurance running, have been at the forefront of research on disordered eating. Yet, little is known about how athletic men and women differ in body checking behaviors, a known risk factor for disordered eating in nonathletes. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine gender differences on measures of eating behavior and body checking between full-time collegiate student-athletes and nonathletes. METHODS: A single survey was sent via email to eligible full-time college students (n = 85 nonathletes) and NCAA student-athletes (n = 174 student-athletes). A 3X3 MANOVA assessed independent variables of sport type (k = 3; team sport, individual sport, nonathlete) and gender identity (k = 3; man, woman, other gender identity) on eating behavior (EAT-26) and masculine body checking (Male Body Checking Questionnaire; mBCQ). RESULTS: There was a statistically significant multivariate main effect of gender F(10, 464) = 9.219, p<0.001, np2 = 0.166, and a significant multivariate interaction of gender and sport type F(15, 699) = 2.806, p=0.001, np2 = 0.057. Follow-up comparisons for team sport athletes found that women overall scored significantly higher (p<0.001) on the mBCQ compared to men. Women team sport athletes also scored significantly higher on the mBCQ than women nonathletes (p < 0.001). In contrast, nonathlete men scored significantly higher on the mBCQ than men team sport athletes (p = 0.003) and individual sport athletes (p = 0.048). No differences were observed among women and other gender identity team sport athletes (all ps > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that body checking behaviors that traditionally have been studied as masculine and male occur more frequently in women than men. This effect seems to be driven by women team sport athletes, who reported more “male” body checking behaviors than the nonathlete women; whereas for men, nonathletes reported more “male” body checking behaviors compared to team and individual sport athletes. Therefore, assessments that are based on traditional views of maleness and femaleness may overlook significant risk factors for eating disorders in college athletes. Future research is needed to investigate the gender-sport type interaction to better understand the risk factors associated with disordered eating.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001056956.02706.96
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining Gender Norms Of Body Image And Eating Behavior In NCAA Student-Athletes

Stephen Cirella, Mark E. Hartman, Lisa L. Harlow, Kathleen Webster
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
article

Examining Gender Norms Of Body Image And Eating Behavior In NCAA Student-Athletes

Stephen Cirella, Mark E. Hartman, Lisa L. Harlow, Kathleen Webster
article en

Abstract

Lean sports, like gymnastics and endurance running, have been at the forefront of research on disordered eating. Yet, little is known about how athletic men and women differ in body checking behaviors, a known risk factor for disordered eating in nonathletes. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine gender differences on measures of eating behavior and body checking between full-time collegiate student-athletes and nonathletes. METHODS: A single survey was sent via email to eligible full-time college students (n = 85 nonathletes) and NCAA student-athletes (n = 174 student-athletes). A 3X3 MANOVA assessed independent variables of sport type (k = 3; team sport, individual sport, nonathlete) and gender identity (k = 3; man, woman, other gender identity) on eating behavior (EAT-26) and masculine body checking (Male Body Checking Questionnaire; mBCQ). RESULTS: There was a statistically significant multivariate main effect of gender F(10, 464) = 9.219, p<0.001, np2 = 0.166, and a significant multivariate interaction of gender and sport type F(15, 699) = 2.806, p=0.001, np2 = 0.057. Follow-up comparisons for team sport athletes found that women overall scored significantly higher (p<0.001) on the mBCQ compared to men. Women team sport athletes also scored significantly higher on the mBCQ than women nonathletes (p < 0.001). In contrast, nonathlete men scored significantly higher on the mBCQ than men team sport athletes (p = 0.003) and individual sport athletes (p = 0.048). No differences were observed among women and other gender identity team sport athletes (all ps > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that body checking behaviors that traditionally have been studied as masculine and male occur more frequently in women than men. This effect seems to be driven by women team sport athletes, who reported more “male” body checking behaviors than the nonathlete women; whereas for men, nonathletes reported more “male” body checking behaviors compared to team and individual sport athletes. Therefore, assessments that are based on traditional views of maleness and femaleness may overlook significant risk factors for eating disorders in college athletes. Future research is needed to investigate the gender-sport type interaction to better understand the risk factors associated with disordered eating.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
University of Rhode Island (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.