City Spending Is Positively Related To Citizen Park Access

PURPOSE: Park amenities represent a public investment to promote healthy lifestyle choices. The purpose of this study is to determine whether there are relationships between walkability to public parks, city investment in park spaces, and park amenities. METHODS: All park data are from the 2023 Trust for Public Land (TPL) City Park Facts for the 100 most populous cities in the United States. Spending is the per capita combined public and private sector investments in the park system, adjusted using the Bureau of Economic Analysis Regional Price Parities. Walkability reflects the percentage of residents that live within a ten-minute walk of at least one park (10 MW). The availability of six different amenities is reported by TPL as a score out of 100 that reflects the relative availability of basketball hoops, dog parks, playgrounds, recreation and senior centers, restrooms, and splashpads. City population, percent of residents that are white and percent of residents that are Hispanic are taken from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey. Correlations and linear regression analyses were used to assess the relationship between park spending, 10 MW, the provision of the six amenities, and population characteristics. RESULTS: Total spending was significantly positively correlated with 10 MW (r = 0.36), basketball hoops (r = 0.25), recreation centers (r = 0.24), and restrooms (r = 0.40) and negatively correlated with the percentage of the residents identifying as Hispanic (r = -0.38). Living within a 10-minute walk was significantly correlated with basketball hoops, dog parks, playgrounds, recreation centers, and splashpads (p < 0.05) but not with restrooms (p = 0.37). The regression model including spending, all six amenities, percent white, Percent Hispanic, and the total population size explained 31.7% of the variance in 10 MW. The only significant predictors of 10 MW were spending (b = 0.08, p < 0.01) and dog parks (b = 0.14, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Total park spending is significantly associated with overall walkability, even when controlling for available amenities and population characteristics. Cities that have more dog parks are likely to have higher overall accessibility of park spaces. Additional research is needed to investigate the longitudinal influence of park investment on park access and quality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001062228.81091.5b
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

City Spending Is Positively Related To Citizen Park Access

Emily Hill Guseman, Karissa L. Peyer, Brittany L. Rogers, Diana Brown
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Economic and Environmental Valuation
article

City Spending Is Positively Related To Citizen Park Access

Emily Hill Guseman, Karissa L. Peyer, Brittany L. Rogers, Diana Brown
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Park amenities represent a public investment to promote healthy lifestyle choices. The purpose of this study is to determine whether there are relationships between walkability to public parks, city investment in park spaces, and park amenities. METHODS: All park data are from the 2023 Trust for Public Land (TPL) City Park Facts for the 100 most populous cities in the United States. Spending is the per capita combined public and private sector investments in the park system, adjusted using the Bureau of Economic Analysis Regional Price Parities. Walkability reflects the percentage of residents that live within a ten-minute walk of at least one park (10 MW). The availability of six different amenities is reported by TPL as a score out of 100 that reflects the relative availability of basketball hoops, dog parks, playgrounds, recreation and senior centers, restrooms, and splashpads. City population, percent of residents that are white and percent of residents that are Hispanic are taken from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey. Correlations and linear regression analyses were used to assess the relationship between park spending, 10 MW, the provision of the six amenities, and population characteristics. RESULTS: Total spending was significantly positively correlated with 10 MW (r = 0.36), basketball hoops (r = 0.25), recreation centers (r = 0.24), and restrooms (r = 0.40) and negatively correlated with the percentage of the residents identifying as Hispanic (r = -0.38). Living within a 10-minute walk was significantly correlated with basketball hoops, dog parks, playgrounds, recreation centers, and splashpads (p < 0.05) but not with restrooms (p = 0.37). The regression model including spending, all six amenities, percent white, Percent Hispanic, and the total population size explained 31.7% of the variance in 10 MW. The only significant predictors of 10 MW were spending (b = 0.08, p < 0.01) and dog parks (b = 0.14, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Total park spending is significantly associated with overall walkability, even when controlling for available amenities and population characteristics. Cities that have more dog parks are likely to have higher overall accessibility of park spaces. Additional research is needed to investigate the longitudinal influence of park investment on park access and quality.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga (US), Ohio University (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.