Constructing A Makeshift Heat Chamber Suitable For Thermoregulatory Research And Heat Acclimation Training

Environmental chambers (HEC) are crucial for thermoregulation and heat acclimation research, but cost burdens drive the creation of cost-effective makeshift heat chambers (MHC). While MHC’s offer affordability, doubts persist about a MHC's ability to maintain stable TEMP and %RH, potentially confounding physiological responses in human thermoregulation. PURPOSE: Build a MHC to maintain temperature and humidity suitable (±1.1-1.7 °C and ± 2-3 %) for thermoregulatory research and heat acclimation protocols. METHODS: A 10’x10’x8’ PVC frame with plastic sheeting, and 5 heaters and 3 humidifiers, was set to maintain 40 °C and 40% RH. 6 young adults, across BMI categories, underwent 4 exercise protocols (Resting, V̇O2max, Cycling, Heat Tolerance) in the MHC, recording TEMP and %RH every 3 minutes. The V̇O2max, cycling, and heat tolerance protocols were repeated for repeatability analysis. The heat tolerance protocol was performed a third time in a HEC for comparison. Descriptive statistics analyzed deviations from hypothetical means of 40 °C and 40%, while approximate F-tests and 95% confidence intervals assessed COV differences between trials and MHC-HEC. A linear mixed model explored factors (metabolic heat, outside temperature, equipment heat, BMI) affecting the deviation from the hypothetical mean TEMP (40 °C). Correlation analyses investigated links between independent factors and TEMP/%RH variations. RESULTS: Mean TEMP was consistently below the hypothetical 40 °C (39.90 ± 0.32 °C), while %RH was consistently higher than 40% (40.86 ± 0.59). TEMP COV range was 1.56-1.77%, and %RH COV was 4.66-5.62%. Repeated trials showed no differences in TEMP, %RH, and COV (95% CI, TEMP [39.81-39.98], %RH [40.44-41.15]; all p > 0.05). In heat tolerance, MHC displayed different TEMP (39.86-40.03 °C) and %RH (40.63-41.15%) compared to HEC (39.39-39.57 °C; 42.48-43.01%; p < 0.001). However, the MHC was closer to the hypothetical 40 °C and 40% than the HEC. The linear mixed model revealed no significant influence of factors on TEMP variation (All R2 < 0.50; p > 0.05). Correlation analyses showed weak non-significant correlations between independent factors and TEMP/%RH variations (r = -0.16-0.13; all p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The constructed MHC, priced under $2,000, is suitable for thermoregulation research at 40 °C and 40% RH. Wyoming SBIR Phase 0 Funding and University of Washington ITHS Funding

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001061752.49831.b8
Primary Topic
Heat Transfer and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constructing A Makeshift Heat Chamber Suitable For Thermoregulatory Research And Heat Acclimation Training

Danielle R. Bruns, Kevin C. Miller, Christopher Bell, Evan C. Johnson et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Heat Transfer and Optimization
article

Constructing A Makeshift Heat Chamber Suitable For Thermoregulatory Research And Heat Acclimation Training

Danielle R. Bruns, Kevin C. Miller, Christopher Bell, Evan C. Johnson, Timothy J. Robinson, Emily E. Schmitt, Zachary J. Schlader, Dillon B. Nye, Bailee R. Smith, Jenna Beckley, Jimmy G. Bautista
article en

Abstract

Environmental chambers (HEC) are crucial for thermoregulation and heat acclimation research, but cost burdens drive the creation of cost-effective makeshift heat chambers (MHC). While MHC’s offer affordability, doubts persist about a MHC's ability to maintain stable TEMP and %RH, potentially confounding physiological responses in human thermoregulation. PURPOSE: Build a MHC to maintain temperature and humidity suitable (±1.1-1.7 °C and ± 2-3 %) for thermoregulatory research and heat acclimation protocols. METHODS: A 10’x10’x8’ PVC frame with plastic sheeting, and 5 heaters and 3 humidifiers, was set to maintain 40 °C and 40% RH. 6 young adults, across BMI categories, underwent 4 exercise protocols (Resting, V̇O2max, Cycling, Heat Tolerance) in the MHC, recording TEMP and %RH every 3 minutes. The V̇O2max, cycling, and heat tolerance protocols were repeated for repeatability analysis. The heat tolerance protocol was performed a third time in a HEC for comparison. Descriptive statistics analyzed deviations from hypothetical means of 40 °C and 40%, while approximate F-tests and 95% confidence intervals assessed COV differences between trials and MHC-HEC. A linear mixed model explored factors (metabolic heat, outside temperature, equipment heat, BMI) affecting the deviation from the hypothetical mean TEMP (40 °C). Correlation analyses investigated links between independent factors and TEMP/%RH variations. RESULTS: Mean TEMP was consistently below the hypothetical 40 °C (39.90 ± 0.32 °C), while %RH was consistently higher than 40% (40.86 ± 0.59). TEMP COV range was 1.56-1.77%, and %RH COV was 4.66-5.62%. Repeated trials showed no differences in TEMP, %RH, and COV (95% CI, TEMP [39.81-39.98], %RH [40.44-41.15]; all p > 0.05). In heat tolerance, MHC displayed different TEMP (39.86-40.03 °C) and %RH (40.63-41.15%) compared to HEC (39.39-39.57 °C; 42.48-43.01%; p < 0.001). However, the MHC was closer to the hypothetical 40 °C and 40% than the HEC. The linear mixed model revealed no significant influence of factors on TEMP variation (All R2 < 0.50; p > 0.05). Correlation analyses showed weak non-significant correlations between independent factors and TEMP/%RH variations (r = -0.16-0.13; all p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The constructed MHC, priced under $2,000, is suitable for thermoregulation research at 40 °C and 40% RH. Wyoming SBIR Phase 0 Funding and University of Washington ITHS Funding

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
University of Wyoming (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US), Colorado State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Heat Transfer and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.