Students And Faculty/staff Have Moderate Self-determined Motivation To Exercise Despite Differences In Motivators And Barriers

Only 48.7% of college students and 24.2% of adults meet the recommended guidelines for physical activity. Therefore, it is important to identify barriers and motivators to physical activity in the university setting. PURPOSE: Compare the barriers and motivators to exercise in faculty/staff compared to students. METHODS: Students and faculty/staff who were currently enrolled or employed at a Pennsylvania university were emailed a link to a 91-question online survey using Qualtrics®. The survey collected information on demographics, physical activity habits, and recreational facility use on and off campus. The survey also included the Barriers to Being Active Questionnaire, Motivations for Physical Activities Measure, and Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ). RESULTS: Faculty/staff (n=69; 49.7±1.2 y; 28.8±0.9 kg/m2) were significantly older and had a significantly higher BMI than students (n=97; 20.5±0.4 y; 25.5±0.6 kg/m2) (both P<0.001). There were no differences in physical activity habits between groups. Students reported significantly greater use of on-campus recreational facilities (P=0.04); whereas faculty/staff reported significantly greater use of off-campus recreational facilities (P=0.004). Faculty/staff (9.3±0.3) reported social influences being a significantly (P=0.02) greater barrier to physical activity than students (8.5±0.2). Students reported that appearance (5.4±0.1 vs. 4.7±0.2; P=0.002) and competence (4.6±0.2 vs. 4.0±0.2; P=0.02) were significantly higher motivators compared to faculty/staff. The BREQ relative autonomy index ranged from -10.3 to 23.0 in students and -9.0 to 22.5 in faculty/staff. On average, students (9.1±0.8) and faculty/staff (10.1±0.8) reported moderate self-determined motivation. CONCLUSION: Students and faculty/staff on average have an internal desire to exercise based on a moderate self-determined motivation. Nevertheless, there are some differences in motivators and barriers to physical activity in students compared to faculty/staff. Collectively, this research can give insight on how to implement programs that can address the barriers and motivators to exercise in students and faculty/staff to enhance exercise engagement in the university setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001056968.76801.7e
Primary Topic
Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Students And Faculty/staff Have Moderate Self-determined Motivation To Exercise Despite Differences In Motivators And Barriers

Nicole M. Gilbertson, Irene L. Muir, E. Moore
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
article

Students And Faculty/staff Have Moderate Self-determined Motivation To Exercise Despite Differences In Motivators And Barriers

Nicole M. Gilbertson, Irene L. Muir, E. Moore
article en

Abstract

Only 48.7% of college students and 24.2% of adults meet the recommended guidelines for physical activity. Therefore, it is important to identify barriers and motivators to physical activity in the university setting. PURPOSE: Compare the barriers and motivators to exercise in faculty/staff compared to students. METHODS: Students and faculty/staff who were currently enrolled or employed at a Pennsylvania university were emailed a link to a 91-question online survey using Qualtrics®. The survey collected information on demographics, physical activity habits, and recreational facility use on and off campus. The survey also included the Barriers to Being Active Questionnaire, Motivations for Physical Activities Measure, and Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ). RESULTS: Faculty/staff (n=69; 49.7±1.2 y; 28.8±0.9 kg/m2) were significantly older and had a significantly higher BMI than students (n=97; 20.5±0.4 y; 25.5±0.6 kg/m2) (both P<0.001). There were no differences in physical activity habits between groups. Students reported significantly greater use of on-campus recreational facilities (P=0.04); whereas faculty/staff reported significantly greater use of off-campus recreational facilities (P=0.004). Faculty/staff (9.3±0.3) reported social influences being a significantly (P=0.02) greater barrier to physical activity than students (8.5±0.2). Students reported that appearance (5.4±0.1 vs. 4.7±0.2; P=0.002) and competence (4.6±0.2 vs. 4.0±0.2; P=0.02) were significantly higher motivators compared to faculty/staff. The BREQ relative autonomy index ranged from -10.3 to 23.0 in students and -9.0 to 22.5 in faculty/staff. On average, students (9.1±0.8) and faculty/staff (10.1±0.8) reported moderate self-determined motivation. CONCLUSION: Students and faculty/staff on average have an internal desire to exercise based on a moderate self-determined motivation. Nevertheless, there are some differences in motivators and barriers to physical activity in students compared to faculty/staff. Collectively, this research can give insight on how to implement programs that can address the barriers and motivators to exercise in students and faculty/staff to enhance exercise engagement in the university setting.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Pennsylvania State University (US), Lebanon Valley College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.