Motor Responses To Patient-Specific Adaptive Dynamic Cycling In Individuals With Deep Brain Stimulation

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurological disorder associated with a degeneration of dopaminergic neurons within the substantia nigra of the brain. PD is characterized by the presence of symptoms including bradykinesia, tremor, postural instability, dyskinesia, cognitive impairment, and speech disorders. High-cadence dynamic cycling has been shown to be an effective therapy for improving motor symptoms in individuals with PD. The number of individuals with PD who have undergone deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery has grown substantially in effort to treat the symptoms associated with the disease. Presently, there is very little known regarding potential benefits of exercise therapies in individuals with PD and DBS. PURPOSE: To compare PD motor symptom responses following 12 sessions of patient-specific adaptive dynamic cycling (PSADC) in individuals with and without DBS. METHODS: 13 individuals (DBS: n = 6; non-DBS: n = 7) with PD (Hoehn and Yahr Stage 1-5) were recruited to perform 12 sessions of PSADC. Sessions consisted of a 5-minute warm up at 60 revolutions per minute (rpm), 30-minute exercise session (80 rpm), and 5-minute cool down (60 rpm). Resistance was optimized weekly based on the individual’s entropy of cadence. The outcome measures assessed were Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale-III (UPDRS-III) score and Timed Up and Go (TUG). UPDRS-III and TUG were assessed in all participants pre- and post- intervention. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare differences in outcomes between groups. RESULTS: There was a significant main effect of time for UPDRS-III (DBS: Pre: 32.7, Post: 27.5; non-DBS: Pre: 32.9, Post: 27.4; F = 24.245, p < .001). However, improvements were not significantly different between DBS and non-DBS (F = .015, p = .905) following the intervention. No significant main effect of time for TUG was found from pre- to post-intervention (F = 1.580, p = .237). CONCLUSION: Motor responses were similar amongst individuals with and without DBS. These results suggest that PSADC may be beneficial for improving motor symptoms in individuals with DBS. These findings will also be valuable in furthering the development of machine learning algorithms to appropriately predict exercise prescriptions for individuals with PD and DBS. Davis Phinney Foundation

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001061280.77380.84
Primary Topic
Neurological disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Motor Responses To Patient-Specific Adaptive Dynamic Cycling In Individuals With Deep Brain Stimulation

Brittany Smith, Angela L. Ridgel, Younguk Kim, Lara Shigo
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Neurological disorders and treatments
article

Motor Responses To Patient-Specific Adaptive Dynamic Cycling In Individuals With Deep Brain Stimulation

Brittany Smith, Angela L. Ridgel, Younguk Kim, Lara Shigo
article en

Abstract

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a neurological disorder associated with a degeneration of dopaminergic neurons within the substantia nigra of the brain. PD is characterized by the presence of symptoms including bradykinesia, tremor, postural instability, dyskinesia, cognitive impairment, and speech disorders. High-cadence dynamic cycling has been shown to be an effective therapy for improving motor symptoms in individuals with PD. The number of individuals with PD who have undergone deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery has grown substantially in effort to treat the symptoms associated with the disease. Presently, there is very little known regarding potential benefits of exercise therapies in individuals with PD and DBS. PURPOSE: To compare PD motor symptom responses following 12 sessions of patient-specific adaptive dynamic cycling (PSADC) in individuals with and without DBS. METHODS: 13 individuals (DBS: n = 6; non-DBS: n = 7) with PD (Hoehn and Yahr Stage 1-5) were recruited to perform 12 sessions of PSADC. Sessions consisted of a 5-minute warm up at 60 revolutions per minute (rpm), 30-minute exercise session (80 rpm), and 5-minute cool down (60 rpm). Resistance was optimized weekly based on the individual’s entropy of cadence. The outcome measures assessed were Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale-III (UPDRS-III) score and Timed Up and Go (TUG). UPDRS-III and TUG were assessed in all participants pre- and post- intervention. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to compare differences in outcomes between groups. RESULTS: There was a significant main effect of time for UPDRS-III (DBS: Pre: 32.7, Post: 27.5; non-DBS: Pre: 32.9, Post: 27.4; F = 24.245, p < .001). However, improvements were not significantly different between DBS and non-DBS (F = .015, p = .905) following the intervention. No significant main effect of time for TUG was found from pre- to post-intervention (F = 1.580, p = .237). CONCLUSION: Motor responses were similar amongst individuals with and without DBS. These results suggest that PSADC may be beneficial for improving motor symptoms in individuals with DBS. These findings will also be valuable in furthering the development of machine learning algorithms to appropriately predict exercise prescriptions for individuals with PD and DBS. Davis Phinney Foundation

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Kent State University (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Neurological disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.