Heat Stress And Strain In Construction Workers During Work In The Summer

Construction workers are at high risk of heat-related illnesses. This elevated risk is likely due to excessive heat stress, defined as the combination of metabolic heat production and excessive environmental heat exposure, which results in heat strain [i.e., increases in core temperature(Tcore)]. Excessive heat stress may vary across job types, reflecting the diversity of tasks performed. Heat stress may also vary for workers based on whether they operate in covered or uncovered work areas. Despite these elevated risks, no previous study has assessed heat strain via Tcore in construction workers during the summer in the United States. PURPOSE: To measure heat stress and strain in construction workers during work in the summer. METHODS: Over 3 days, 32 construction workers (3 females) were monitored during a summer workday in a commercial building work site. Participants were identified by both job type (4 carpenters, 15 concrete, 8 laborers, and 5 roofer workers) and work environment (covered, uncovered). Heat index (HI), heart rate (HR), and Tcore (intestinal, n = 28) were measured throughout the workday. Urine specific gravity (USG) was used to assess hydration status pre- and post-shift. RESULTS: Peak HI over the three days were 27.3, 35.2, and 33.7 °C. Roofers were exposed to a higher HI compared to other job types (p < 0.001), but no overall differences were observed between covered (28.8 ± 3.7 °C) and uncovered (32.1 ± 4.2 °C) areas (p = 0.366). Metabolic rate (MR) calculated from HR and corrected for Tcore was higher in workers in uncovered (423 ± 127 W/m2) compared to covered (316 ± 50 W/m2) (p = 0.006) areas, but not different among job types (p = 0.227). Peak Tcore exceeded 38.0 °C in 43% of the participants, with 4% exceeding 38.5 °C. There was no change in USG from pre- (1.022 ± 0.005) to post-shift (1.022 ± 0.007) (p = 0.846). Notably, 63% of workers began their shift dehydrated (USG > 1.020). A significant positive correlation was found between peak MR and peak Tcore (R = 0.62, p = 0.001). A positive, non-significant correlation was noted between peak HI and peak Tcore (R = 0.36, p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Even during low to moderate environmental heat stress, construction workers experience significant heat strain, which is associated with peak MR. Environmental heat exposure and metabolic work vary by job type and work environment. This study was supported by CPWR (#22-5-PS) and NIOSH (R01OH011528).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001060284.09191.e0
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Heat Stress And Strain In Construction Workers During Work In The Summer

Hillary A. Yoder, Jason Glaser, Jo Hite, Jonathan Specht et al.
2 citations
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Climate Change and Health Impacts
0.63
article

Heat Stress And Strain In Construction Workers During Work In The Summer

Hillary A. Yoder, Jason Glaser, Jo Hite, Jonathan Specht, David H. Wegman, Fabiano Trigueiro Amorim, Zachary J. Schlader, Erica Tourula, Charlie Walker, Serena Garcia
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Construction workers are at high risk of heat-related illnesses. This elevated risk is likely due to excessive heat stress, defined as the combination of metabolic heat production and excessive environmental heat exposure, which results in heat strain [i.e., increases in core temperature(Tcore)]. Excessive heat stress may vary across job types, reflecting the diversity of tasks performed. Heat stress may also vary for workers based on whether they operate in covered or uncovered work areas. Despite these elevated risks, no previous study has assessed heat strain via Tcore in construction workers during the summer in the United States. PURPOSE: To measure heat stress and strain in construction workers during work in the summer. METHODS: Over 3 days, 32 construction workers (3 females) were monitored during a summer workday in a commercial building work site. Participants were identified by both job type (4 carpenters, 15 concrete, 8 laborers, and 5 roofer workers) and work environment (covered, uncovered). Heat index (HI), heart rate (HR), and Tcore (intestinal, n = 28) were measured throughout the workday. Urine specific gravity (USG) was used to assess hydration status pre- and post-shift. RESULTS: Peak HI over the three days were 27.3, 35.2, and 33.7 °C. Roofers were exposed to a higher HI compared to other job types (p < 0.001), but no overall differences were observed between covered (28.8 ± 3.7 °C) and uncovered (32.1 ± 4.2 °C) areas (p = 0.366). Metabolic rate (MR) calculated from HR and corrected for Tcore was higher in workers in uncovered (423 ± 127 W/m2) compared to covered (316 ± 50 W/m2) (p = 0.006) areas, but not different among job types (p = 0.227). Peak Tcore exceeded 38.0 °C in 43% of the participants, with 4% exceeding 38.5 °C. There was no change in USG from pre- (1.022 ± 0.005) to post-shift (1.022 ± 0.007) (p = 0.846). Notably, 63% of workers began their shift dehydrated (USG > 1.020). A significant positive correlation was found between peak MR and peak Tcore (R = 0.62, p = 0.001). A positive, non-significant correlation was noted between peak HI and peak Tcore (R = 0.36, p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Even during low to moderate environmental heat stress, construction workers experience significant heat strain, which is associated with peak MR. Environmental heat exposure and metabolic work vary by job type and work environment. This study was supported by CPWR (#22-5-PS) and NIOSH (R01OH011528).

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
New Mexico State University (US), University of Massachusetts Lowell (US), University of New Mexico (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US), Action Network (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
0.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.