Gait Patterns Differ In Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis With And Without Transfemoral Amputation

PURPOSE: To compare gait kinematics between individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) with and without unilateral transfemoral amputation (TF) and measure the relationship between strength and gait mechanics. METHODS: Five individuals with unilateral TF (3F/2M, 61.0 ± 5.8 years, 90.4 ± 20.3 kg, 168.7 ± 11.7 cm) and symptomatic KOA in the intact limb were matched with 9 individuals with KOA (CON) without leg amputation (4F/5M, 66.1 ± 9.9 years, 87.6 ± 21.0 kg, 173.0 ± 10.2 cm) for strength measures and gait analysis on a split-belt treadmill at a self-selected speed. Gait kinematics were analyzed using waveform analysis with 90% confidence intervals. Differences between groups were considered significant if the 90% confidence intervals did not overlap for three or more consecutive points and were reported as mean differences (MD) ± standard deviation. Associations between kinematic measures during the first and second 50% of stance and quadriceps and hamstring isokinetic peak torque (PT) were evaluated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) for the involved limb (with symptomatic KOA). RESULTS: The TF group demonstrated greater knee flexion (6.1 ± 1.5°), knee external rotation (6.6 ± .86°), hip external rotation (3.5 ± .25°), and trunk rotation (6.4 ± 1.4°) compared to the CON group during stance. The TF group also demonstrated reduced knee varus (2.5 ± .31°) and hip adduction (4.0 ± .69°) compared to the CON group. The TF group exhibited significant negative correlation between quadriceps PT and peak hip abduction (r = -.89;p = .043) while the CON group had significant negative correlation between quadriceps PT and peak trunk flexion (r = -.76;p = .017) during the first 50% of stance. During the second half of stance, the TF group exhibited significant negative correlation between hamstring PT and peak hip abduction (r = -.88;p = .049), while the CON group exhibited significant negative correlations between quadriceps PT and peak trunk flexion (r = -.79;p = .011) and peak trunk lateral flexion (r = -.67;p = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with unilateral TF and KOA in their intact limb demonstrate significantly different gait patterns than CON with KOA during stance. Further, isokinetic strength is associated with peak hip abduction in the TF group while it is associated with trunk kinematics in the CON group during stance. UIC Applied Health Sciences Interdisciplinary Pilot Award

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001057620.30166.98
Primary Topic
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gait Patterns Differ In Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis With And Without Transfemoral Amputation

Kharma C. Foucher, Nikou Nikoumanesh, Lindsay Slater Hannigan, Shraddha Sudhir
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
article

Gait Patterns Differ In Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis With And Without Transfemoral Amputation

Kharma C. Foucher, Nikou Nikoumanesh, Lindsay Slater Hannigan, Shraddha Sudhir
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare gait kinematics between individuals with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) with and without unilateral transfemoral amputation (TF) and measure the relationship between strength and gait mechanics. METHODS: Five individuals with unilateral TF (3F/2M, 61.0 ± 5.8 years, 90.4 ± 20.3 kg, 168.7 ± 11.7 cm) and symptomatic KOA in the intact limb were matched with 9 individuals with KOA (CON) without leg amputation (4F/5M, 66.1 ± 9.9 years, 87.6 ± 21.0 kg, 173.0 ± 10.2 cm) for strength measures and gait analysis on a split-belt treadmill at a self-selected speed. Gait kinematics were analyzed using waveform analysis with 90% confidence intervals. Differences between groups were considered significant if the 90% confidence intervals did not overlap for three or more consecutive points and were reported as mean differences (MD) ± standard deviation. Associations between kinematic measures during the first and second 50% of stance and quadriceps and hamstring isokinetic peak torque (PT) were evaluated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) for the involved limb (with symptomatic KOA). RESULTS: The TF group demonstrated greater knee flexion (6.1 ± 1.5°), knee external rotation (6.6 ± .86°), hip external rotation (3.5 ± .25°), and trunk rotation (6.4 ± 1.4°) compared to the CON group during stance. The TF group also demonstrated reduced knee varus (2.5 ± .31°) and hip adduction (4.0 ± .69°) compared to the CON group. The TF group exhibited significant negative correlation between quadriceps PT and peak hip abduction (r = -.89;p = .043) while the CON group had significant negative correlation between quadriceps PT and peak trunk flexion (r = -.76;p = .017) during the first 50% of stance. During the second half of stance, the TF group exhibited significant negative correlation between hamstring PT and peak hip abduction (r = -.88;p = .049), while the CON group exhibited significant negative correlations between quadriceps PT and peak trunk flexion (r = -.79;p = .011) and peak trunk lateral flexion (r = -.67;p = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with unilateral TF and KOA in their intact limb demonstrate significantly different gait patterns than CON with KOA during stance. Further, isokinetic strength is associated with peak hip abduction in the TF group while it is associated with trunk kinematics in the CON group during stance. UIC Applied Health Sciences Interdisciplinary Pilot Award

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.