The Influence Of Social Determinants Of Health On Primary Caregiver Health Practices And Home Environment

PURPOSE: Explore the influence of social determinants of health (SDOH) on caregiver practices and home environment related to physical activity (PA), outdoor play, and screen time in families with typically developing (TD), Down syndrome- (DS), or autism-diagnosed children ages 2-6 years. METHODS: Primary caregivers (n = 172) of children (TD: n = 93, DS: n = 40, Autism n = 39) completed an online survey on SDOH and PA, outdoor play, and screen time practices. SDOH data were grouped into 5 constructs as defined by Healthy People 2030. Construct scores of 0-5 points were created for healthcare access and 0-2 points for economic stability, education, residential environment, and social context and support. SDOH total score (range 0-13 points) was calculated by summing up construct scores (higher scores = more favorable SDOH). Each variable was weighted equally. Descriptive statistics (e.g., mean, standard deviation, percent) and linear regression models (i.e., beta [β], 95% confidence intervals [CI]) were used to examine the survey data. RESULTS: Most caregivers were married (89.5%), non-Hispanic white (84.3%), female (76.7%), and 18-35 years old (55.2%). The overall SDOH mean score was 10.2 ± 2.5. TD group had the highest SDOH score (11 ± 2.4), followed by autism (10.1 ± 2.6), and DS (8.4 ± 1.7). In an analysis by SDOH constructs, DS scored lowest except in social context/support. Linear regression showed significant (p = <0.05) associations between SDOH constructs and caregiver practices. Total PA practice score was positively associated with residential environment (β = 5.94, 95% CI = 1.95, 9.94). Total outdoor play practice score was positively associated with income (β =9.27, 95% CI = 4.95, 13.58), education (β = 15.10, 95% CI = 6.75, 23.45), healthcare (β = 4.12, 95% CI = 2.10, 6.15), residential environment (β = 17.26, 95% CI = 12.12, 22.40), and social context/support (β = 7.62, 95% CI = 2.74, 12.50). Total screen time practice score was positively associated with residential environment (β = 6.27, 95% CI = 2.17, 10.36). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights SDOH's influence on family health-related practices. Future research must prioritize SDOH in health interventions, particularly in exploring impacts on non-typically developing children to understand their varied impacts in this context. Recruitment for This research was supported by the UNC Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center (IDDRC), P50 HD103573. This research was supported by a grant from the T32 Cancer Health Disparities Training Grant from the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Heal

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001060456.03540.cf
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Influence Of Social Determinants Of Health On Primary Caregiver Health Practices And Home Environment

Emily Clarke, Michaela A. Schenkelberg, Heather Wasser, Kelsey Thompson et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Health disparities and outcomes
article

The Influence Of Social Determinants Of Health On Primary Caregiver Health Practices And Home Environment

Emily Clarke, Michaela A. Schenkelberg, Heather Wasser, Kelsey Thompson, Erik A. Willis, Phoebe P. Tchoua, Rebecca Scothorn, Seema Agrawal
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Explore the influence of social determinants of health (SDOH) on caregiver practices and home environment related to physical activity (PA), outdoor play, and screen time in families with typically developing (TD), Down syndrome- (DS), or autism-diagnosed children ages 2-6 years. METHODS: Primary caregivers (n = 172) of children (TD: n = 93, DS: n = 40, Autism n = 39) completed an online survey on SDOH and PA, outdoor play, and screen time practices. SDOH data were grouped into 5 constructs as defined by Healthy People 2030. Construct scores of 0-5 points were created for healthcare access and 0-2 points for economic stability, education, residential environment, and social context and support. SDOH total score (range 0-13 points) was calculated by summing up construct scores (higher scores = more favorable SDOH). Each variable was weighted equally. Descriptive statistics (e.g., mean, standard deviation, percent) and linear regression models (i.e., beta [β], 95% confidence intervals [CI]) were used to examine the survey data. RESULTS: Most caregivers were married (89.5%), non-Hispanic white (84.3%), female (76.7%), and 18-35 years old (55.2%). The overall SDOH mean score was 10.2 ± 2.5. TD group had the highest SDOH score (11 ± 2.4), followed by autism (10.1 ± 2.6), and DS (8.4 ± 1.7). In an analysis by SDOH constructs, DS scored lowest except in social context/support. Linear regression showed significant (p = <0.05) associations between SDOH constructs and caregiver practices. Total PA practice score was positively associated with residential environment (β = 5.94, 95% CI = 1.95, 9.94). Total outdoor play practice score was positively associated with income (β =9.27, 95% CI = 4.95, 13.58), education (β = 15.10, 95% CI = 6.75, 23.45), healthcare (β = 4.12, 95% CI = 2.10, 6.15), residential environment (β = 17.26, 95% CI = 12.12, 22.40), and social context/support (β = 7.62, 95% CI = 2.74, 12.50). Total screen time practice score was positively associated with residential environment (β = 6.27, 95% CI = 2.17, 10.36). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights SDOH's influence on family health-related practices. Future research must prioritize SDOH in health interventions, particularly in exploring impacts on non-typically developing children to understand their varied impacts in this context. Recruitment for This research was supported by the UNC Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center (IDDRC), P50 HD103573. This research was supported by a grant from the T32 Cancer Health Disparities Training Grant from the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Heal

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of Nebraska at Omaha (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.