Sex-based Differences In Corticospinal Excitability And Inhibition

Males and females differ in anatomy and physiology at many levels of the body, including the brain, which could influence the communication from the brain to the muscle, impacting movement control. However, sex-based differences in excitability and inhibition within the corticomotor pathway have not been extensively studied. PURPOSE: To examine sex-based differences in corticospinal excitability and inhibition. METHODS: Thirteen individuals (23.9 ± 2.1 yrs) 8 males, 5 females, participated in the present study. Males were tested around the same time of day in the afternoon and females were tested during the same phase of their menstrual cycle (mid-follicular; day 7.6 ± 0.5). Electromyography was recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle in response to TMS of the contralateral motor cortex. Single-pulse stimuli were used to assess excitability via the motor-evoked potential (MEP) and inhibition via the cortical silent period (CSP). Additionally, paired-pulse stimuli were used to assess excitability via intracortical facilitation (ICF) and inhibition via short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI). All outcome measures were compared between males and females. RESULTS: Males had similar levels of excitability compared with females via MEP (2.9 ± 1.0 mV vs 3.06 ± 1.37 mV; p = 0.86; d = 0.11) and ICF (68.0 ± 70.7% vs 36.7 ± 100.1%; p = 0.52; d = 0.38). Inhibition was also similar between males and females, as assessed by CSP duration (124.3 ± 30.6 ms vs 91.6 ± 43.9 ms; p = 0.16; d = 0.90), SICI (-62.9 ± 26.0% vs -59.3 ± 30.5%; p = 0.82; d = 0.13), and LICI (-81.4 ± 18.2% vs -71.6 ± 26.4%; p = 0.47; d = 0.46). CONCLUSION: No significant differences in corticospinal excitability or inhibition were observed between males and females, when controlling for lower hormone fluctuation timepoints. However, considering effect sizes, CSP may reach significance with a greater sample size. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) RGPIN-2019-05127

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001056388.32777.2d
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex-based Differences In Corticospinal Excitability And Inhibition

Alexandra N. Pauhl, Anita Christie, Alicia M. Kells
1 citations
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
0.36
article

Sex-based Differences In Corticospinal Excitability And Inhibition

Alexandra N. Pauhl, Anita Christie, Alicia M. Kells
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Males and females differ in anatomy and physiology at many levels of the body, including the brain, which could influence the communication from the brain to the muscle, impacting movement control. However, sex-based differences in excitability and inhibition within the corticomotor pathway have not been extensively studied. PURPOSE: To examine sex-based differences in corticospinal excitability and inhibition. METHODS: Thirteen individuals (23.9 ± 2.1 yrs) 8 males, 5 females, participated in the present study. Males were tested around the same time of day in the afternoon and females were tested during the same phase of their menstrual cycle (mid-follicular; day 7.6 ± 0.5). Electromyography was recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle in response to TMS of the contralateral motor cortex. Single-pulse stimuli were used to assess excitability via the motor-evoked potential (MEP) and inhibition via the cortical silent period (CSP). Additionally, paired-pulse stimuli were used to assess excitability via intracortical facilitation (ICF) and inhibition via short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI). All outcome measures were compared between males and females. RESULTS: Males had similar levels of excitability compared with females via MEP (2.9 ± 1.0 mV vs 3.06 ± 1.37 mV; p = 0.86; d = 0.11) and ICF (68.0 ± 70.7% vs 36.7 ± 100.1%; p = 0.52; d = 0.38). Inhibition was also similar between males and females, as assessed by CSP duration (124.3 ± 30.6 ms vs 91.6 ± 43.9 ms; p = 0.16; d = 0.90), SICI (-62.9 ± 26.0% vs -59.3 ± 30.5%; p = 0.82; d = 0.13), and LICI (-81.4 ± 18.2% vs -71.6 ± 26.4%; p = 0.47; d = 0.46). CONCLUSION: No significant differences in corticospinal excitability or inhibition were observed between males and females, when controlling for lower hormone fluctuation timepoints. However, considering effect sizes, CSP may reach significance with a greater sample size. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) RGPIN-2019-05127

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Western University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
0.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.