Comparing Two Different Exercise Prescription Methods To Increase Physical Activity Among College Students

Most Americans do not meet the physical activity (PA) guidelines of 150 min of moderate and/or 75 min of weekly vigorous-intensity aerobic exercise or a combination of both and 2 d/wk of resistance exercise. Thus, there is a call for scalable and easily implemented strategies to increase PA. PURPOSE: To compare two different exercise prescription (ExRx) methods for increasing PA with the message: ExRx#1, meet the PA guidelines, or ExRx#2, perform as much PA as possible of any frequency, intensity, time, and type. We hypothesized ExRx#2 would increase PA more than ExRx#1 over the 12 wk intervention. METHODS: Healthy college students (n = 78) were enrolled and randomized to ExRx#1 (n = 39) or ExRx#2 (n = 39). Of these, 53 students (24.0 ± 5.1 yr, 25.1 ± 3.6 m•kg-2) began the intervention (ExRx#1 n = 29; ExRx#2 n = 24) of which 71% were females who performed ≤2 d of structured PA in the last 12 wk. We measured PA via accelerometry and the Timeline Followback (TLFB-E) at baseline and 12 wk. RMANCOVA tested differences within and between groups. RESULTS: At baseline, via accelerometry, ExRx#1 performed 93.1 ± 46.5 min/d of moderate-vigorous intensity (MVPA) PA and ExRx#2 performed 91.4 ± 46.5 min/d of MVPA, with no difference between groups (p = 0.92). Over 12 wk, via accelerometry, MVPA min/wk was not different from baseline for ExRx#1 and ExRx#2 (ps > 0.05). Over 12 wk, via the TLFB-E, ExRx#2 performed 1.1 ± 3.1 more PA sessions/wk (3.2 ± 1.5) than ExRx#1 (2.1 ± 1.5, p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: When assessed by accelerometry, PA was not different from baseline, regardless of the ExRx method, whereas frequency increased ~1 d/wk more in ExRx#2 than ExRx#1 via the TLFB-E. Our findings illustrate the importance of utilizing both objective and self-report PA assessments to capture the different PA behaviors that may be influenced by different ExRx methods. Supported By: The University of Connecticut's Health Fitness Research Laboratory

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001054864.23831.ca
Primary Topic
Physical Activity and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Two Different Exercise Prescription Methods To Increase Physical Activity Among College Students

Christina A. Day, Linda S. Pescatello, Rachel S. Berkowsky, Yin Wu et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Physical Activity and Health
article

Comparing Two Different Exercise Prescription Methods To Increase Physical Activity Among College Students

Christina A. Day, Linda S. Pescatello, Rachel S. Berkowsky, Yin Wu, Crystal L. Park, Melody Kramarz, Elyssa L. Error, Alexander John Wright, Beth M. Taylor, Amy P. Dunham
article en

Abstract

Most Americans do not meet the physical activity (PA) guidelines of 150 min of moderate and/or 75 min of weekly vigorous-intensity aerobic exercise or a combination of both and 2 d/wk of resistance exercise. Thus, there is a call for scalable and easily implemented strategies to increase PA. PURPOSE: To compare two different exercise prescription (ExRx) methods for increasing PA with the message: ExRx#1, meet the PA guidelines, or ExRx#2, perform as much PA as possible of any frequency, intensity, time, and type. We hypothesized ExRx#2 would increase PA more than ExRx#1 over the 12 wk intervention. METHODS: Healthy college students (n = 78) were enrolled and randomized to ExRx#1 (n = 39) or ExRx#2 (n = 39). Of these, 53 students (24.0 ± 5.1 yr, 25.1 ± 3.6 m•kg-2) began the intervention (ExRx#1 n = 29; ExRx#2 n = 24) of which 71% were females who performed ≤2 d of structured PA in the last 12 wk. We measured PA via accelerometry and the Timeline Followback (TLFB-E) at baseline and 12 wk. RMANCOVA tested differences within and between groups. RESULTS: At baseline, via accelerometry, ExRx#1 performed 93.1 ± 46.5 min/d of moderate-vigorous intensity (MVPA) PA and ExRx#2 performed 91.4 ± 46.5 min/d of MVPA, with no difference between groups (p = 0.92). Over 12 wk, via accelerometry, MVPA min/wk was not different from baseline for ExRx#1 and ExRx#2 (ps > 0.05). Over 12 wk, via the TLFB-E, ExRx#2 performed 1.1 ± 3.1 more PA sessions/wk (3.2 ± 1.5) than ExRx#1 (2.1 ± 1.5, p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: When assessed by accelerometry, PA was not different from baseline, regardless of the ExRx method, whereas frequency increased ~1 d/wk more in ExRx#2 than ExRx#1 via the TLFB-E. Our findings illustrate the importance of utilizing both objective and self-report PA assessments to capture the different PA behaviors that may be influenced by different ExRx methods. Supported By: The University of Connecticut's Health Fitness Research Laboratory

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Hartford Hospital (US), University of Connecticut (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Physical Activity and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.