Dietary Cognitive Restraint Is Not Indicative Of Energy Deficiency In Exercising Men

Exercising men are at risk for energy deficiency, and few assessments have been validated for use in this population. The Eating Disorder Inventory-3 (EDI-3), Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ), Drive for Muscularity (DM), and Drive for Leanness (DL) scales can identify energy deficiency risk. In active women, EDI-3 Drive for Thinness scores ≥15 correlated with lower total triiodothyronine (TT3) and resting metabolic rate (RMR). However, associations among these scales and threshold scores for men have not been established. PURPOSE: Determine whether a dietary cognitive restraint (DCR) score of ≥13 identifies energy deficiency in exercising men. METHODS: 25 athletes and 16 active men (22.3 ± 3.5 yr) completed the EDI-3, TFEQ, DM and DL scales. Body dissatisfaction (BD), drive for thinness, perfection (EDI-3), CDR (TFEQ), DM and DL were assessed. Prior research suggests that a cut-off >13 may indicate energy deficiency in males so a DCR score ≥ 13 was used to indicate high DCR (HCR) and those <13 indicated normal DCR (NCR). Body mass index (BMI), serum TT3 and RMR ratios (actual/predicted) were assessed. Correlation analyses determined associations between variables. Independent T-tests compared RMR ratios, BMI, TT3, and other subscales between individuals with HCR and NCR groups. RESULTS: Significant associations existed between DCR score and DT (r = .47, p = .002), DM (r = .43, p = .005), and DL (r = .56, p < .001). HCR vs. NCR groups presented with higher DM (40.6 ± 16.6 vs 51.5 ± 12.3; p = .042), DL (34.4 ± 11.9 vs 42.2 ± 8.4; p = .038), and BD(4.8 ± 5.2 vs 9.2 ± 5.6; p = .049). Despite these findings, there were no differences between HCR and NCR groups with respect to BMI, serum TT3, or RMR ratios (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that high DCR may indicate high-risk disordered eating related to specific body image ideals. In contrast to women, these psychological attributes are not associated with physiological indicators of energy deficiency in athletes and active, reinforcing the need for more sex-specific research to identify energy deficiency in exercising men. Pennsylvania State University Social Science Research Institute

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001057980.41556.e8
Primary Topic
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dietary Cognitive Restraint Is Not Indicative Of Energy Deficiency In Exercising Men

Mary Jane De Souza, Nancy I. Williams, Emily A. Lundstrom, Keiona M. Khen et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
article

Dietary Cognitive Restraint Is Not Indicative Of Energy Deficiency In Exercising Men

Mary Jane De Souza, Nancy I. Williams, Emily A. Lundstrom, Keiona M. Khen, Ana Carla C. Salamunes
article en

Abstract

Exercising men are at risk for energy deficiency, and few assessments have been validated for use in this population. The Eating Disorder Inventory-3 (EDI-3), Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ), Drive for Muscularity (DM), and Drive for Leanness (DL) scales can identify energy deficiency risk. In active women, EDI-3 Drive for Thinness scores ≥15 correlated with lower total triiodothyronine (TT3) and resting metabolic rate (RMR). However, associations among these scales and threshold scores for men have not been established. PURPOSE: Determine whether a dietary cognitive restraint (DCR) score of ≥13 identifies energy deficiency in exercising men. METHODS: 25 athletes and 16 active men (22.3 ± 3.5 yr) completed the EDI-3, TFEQ, DM and DL scales. Body dissatisfaction (BD), drive for thinness, perfection (EDI-3), CDR (TFEQ), DM and DL were assessed. Prior research suggests that a cut-off >13 may indicate energy deficiency in males so a DCR score ≥ 13 was used to indicate high DCR (HCR) and those <13 indicated normal DCR (NCR). Body mass index (BMI), serum TT3 and RMR ratios (actual/predicted) were assessed. Correlation analyses determined associations between variables. Independent T-tests compared RMR ratios, BMI, TT3, and other subscales between individuals with HCR and NCR groups. RESULTS: Significant associations existed between DCR score and DT (r = .47, p = .002), DM (r = .43, p = .005), and DL (r = .56, p < .001). HCR vs. NCR groups presented with higher DM (40.6 ± 16.6 vs 51.5 ± 12.3; p = .042), DL (34.4 ± 11.9 vs 42.2 ± 8.4; p = .038), and BD(4.8 ± 5.2 vs 9.2 ± 5.6; p = .049). Despite these findings, there were no differences between HCR and NCR groups with respect to BMI, serum TT3, or RMR ratios (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that high DCR may indicate high-risk disordered eating related to specific body image ideals. In contrast to women, these psychological attributes are not associated with physiological indicators of energy deficiency in athletes and active, reinforcing the need for more sex-specific research to identify energy deficiency in exercising men. Pennsylvania State University Social Science Research Institute

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.