Injury Experiences Of Collegiate Distance Runners And Implications For Future Injury Reporting

PURPOSE: To explore the injury experiences of collegiate distance runners and understand factors that affect their intentions reporting future injuries. METHODS: Collegiate distance runners completed an online survey about their past injury experiences and intentions of future injury reporting. Future injury reporting intentions were assessed using a case scenario guided by the Disclosure Decision-Making Model. RESULTS: 392 distance runners from NCAA Divisions I, II, and III completed the survey. Of these, 60.7% experienced an injury during their most recent competitive season. Among the recently injured participants, 53.8% reported injury symptoms to their coaches first, followed by 30.7% who initially reported injury symptoms to an athletic trainer. Participants who initially reported symptoms to coaches held closer coach-athlete relationships than their peers (p = 0.01). On average, participants reported a 68.3% likelihood of telling a coach or trainer about a future onset of injury symptoms. There were no differences in future injury reporting intentions by sex or recent injury status, however, participants with a history of Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (RED-S) held lower intentions to report future injury symptoms than their peers (61.0% likely vs. 72.0% likely, p < 0.001). Additionally, participants who experienced greater time loss from a previous injury held lower intentions to report future injury symptoms than their peers (63.3% likely vs. 69.8% likely, p = 0.04). Overall, participants with lower intentions of reporting future injury symptoms perceived a greater stigma with being injured (p < 0.001), held more distant relationships with their coaches (p = 0.02), and perceived the symptoms described in the case scenario to be less severe when compared to their peers (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among this sample of collegiate distance runners, past injury experiences influenced future injury reporting intentions. Participants with more severe injury histories and those with a history of RED-S held lower intentions of reporting future injury symptoms than their peers. Reducing the stigma associated with being injured and nurturing close coach-athlete relationships may improve future injury reporting intentions among collegiate distance runners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001061800.37983.24
Primary Topic
Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Injury Experiences Of Collegiate Distance Runners And Implications For Future Injury Reporting

Abigail Robertson, Bethany Graham, Chris Hopkins, Beth Donnelly et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
article

Injury Experiences Of Collegiate Distance Runners And Implications For Future Injury Reporting

Abigail Robertson, Bethany Graham, Chris Hopkins, Beth Donnelly, Jonna Strange
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To explore the injury experiences of collegiate distance runners and understand factors that affect their intentions reporting future injuries. METHODS: Collegiate distance runners completed an online survey about their past injury experiences and intentions of future injury reporting. Future injury reporting intentions were assessed using a case scenario guided by the Disclosure Decision-Making Model. RESULTS: 392 distance runners from NCAA Divisions I, II, and III completed the survey. Of these, 60.7% experienced an injury during their most recent competitive season. Among the recently injured participants, 53.8% reported injury symptoms to their coaches first, followed by 30.7% who initially reported injury symptoms to an athletic trainer. Participants who initially reported symptoms to coaches held closer coach-athlete relationships than their peers (p = 0.01). On average, participants reported a 68.3% likelihood of telling a coach or trainer about a future onset of injury symptoms. There were no differences in future injury reporting intentions by sex or recent injury status, however, participants with a history of Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (RED-S) held lower intentions to report future injury symptoms than their peers (61.0% likely vs. 72.0% likely, p < 0.001). Additionally, participants who experienced greater time loss from a previous injury held lower intentions to report future injury symptoms than their peers (63.3% likely vs. 69.8% likely, p = 0.04). Overall, participants with lower intentions of reporting future injury symptoms perceived a greater stigma with being injured (p < 0.001), held more distant relationships with their coaches (p = 0.02), and perceived the symptoms described in the case scenario to be less severe when compared to their peers (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among this sample of collegiate distance runners, past injury experiences influenced future injury reporting intentions. Participants with more severe injury histories and those with a history of RED-S held lower intentions of reporting future injury symptoms than their peers. Reducing the stigma associated with being injured and nurturing close coach-athlete relationships may improve future injury reporting intentions among collegiate distance runners.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Furman University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.