Physical Function Appears Stable Across 24 Weeks Of Treatment For Advanced Prostate Cancer

Cross-sectional studies indicate that men with metastatic prostate cancer (PC) using androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI) have lower physical function (PF). However, the rate of change in PF remains unclear. PURPOSE: This observational pilot study longitudinally examined objectively measured PF in men with advanced PC initiating ARSI treatment. Additionally, changes in grip strength, muscular power, balance, and body composition were evaluated. METHODS: Study participants (n = 13, 73 ± 8 y, 29.2 ± 4.3 kg/m2 BMI) completed testing at baseline and 24-weeks. The majority (77%) of men were diagnosed with castration-sensitive metastatic PC. The primary outcome was PF and was assessed using a composite of short physical performance battery [SPPB], timed up and go [TUG], and 400 m walk. Secondary outcomes included grip strength (handgrip dynamometry), peak and mean power (GymAware sit-to-stand test), body composition (dual energy X-ray absorptiometry), and balance (Sensory Organization Test). Mean differences (MD) were calculated as 24-week - baseline. Effect sizes are reported as Cohen’s D. RESULTS: From baseline to 24 weeks of ARSI, no changes in PF where observed in the 400 m walk [MD: +1.8 s; 95% CI (-13.3, -16.8); p = 0.822, d = 0.05], SPPB [+0.3 points; (-0.03, 0.8); p = 0.363, d = 0.27] or TUG [+0.3 s; (-0.6, 1.2); p = 0.512, d = 0.18]. For the secondary outcomes, no differences were observed for muscle function when assessing grip strength [-0.1 kg; (-2.3, 1.9); p = 0.874, d = 0.03] or mean power [-13 W; (-74, 48); p = 0.682, d = 0.13]. Peak power decreased by -11.8% [-102 W; (-228, 23); p = 0.134, d = 0.50] and lean mass by -2.8% [-1.6 kg; (-4.2, 1.1); p = 0.271, d = 0.31) with a 4.1% increase in balance [+3.0 pt; (-2.1, 8.1); p = 0.274, d = 0.29] that yielded small to moderate effect sizes but none reached statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to prior cross-sectional studies, these preliminary results suggest that 24 weeks of ARSI may not adversely affect objectively measured PF, nor any of our secondary outcomes associated with PF. As such, PF may be more stable during ARSI for hormone-sensitive PC than previously thought. However, the current sample size and possible learning effects in some tasks warrants caution and requires further investigation. This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute. Lauren C. Bates-Fraser is supported by the National Cancer Institute's National Research Service Award sponsored by the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of North Carolina (T32 CA116339).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001062020.02597.b4
Primary Topic
Hormonal and reproductive studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physical Function Appears Stable Across 24 Weeks Of Treatment For Advanced Prostate Cancer

Young E. Whang, Lauren C. Bates‐Fraser, Erik D. Hanson, Cláudio L. Battaglini et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Hormonal and reproductive studies
article

Physical Function Appears Stable Across 24 Weeks Of Treatment For Advanced Prostate Cancer

Young E. Whang, Lauren C. Bates‐Fraser, Erik D. Hanson, Cláudio L. Battaglini, Daniel James Crona, Hsuan-Hui Liu, Sam R. Moore, Abrar Al Hammadi, Kailyn E. Lowder, Mark Belio, Sarah Blount, Ayange S. Ayangeakaa, Lillian C. Niehaus
article en

Abstract

Cross-sectional studies indicate that men with metastatic prostate cancer (PC) using androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI) have lower physical function (PF). However, the rate of change in PF remains unclear. PURPOSE: This observational pilot study longitudinally examined objectively measured PF in men with advanced PC initiating ARSI treatment. Additionally, changes in grip strength, muscular power, balance, and body composition were evaluated. METHODS: Study participants (n = 13, 73 ± 8 y, 29.2 ± 4.3 kg/m2 BMI) completed testing at baseline and 24-weeks. The majority (77%) of men were diagnosed with castration-sensitive metastatic PC. The primary outcome was PF and was assessed using a composite of short physical performance battery [SPPB], timed up and go [TUG], and 400 m walk. Secondary outcomes included grip strength (handgrip dynamometry), peak and mean power (GymAware sit-to-stand test), body composition (dual energy X-ray absorptiometry), and balance (Sensory Organization Test). Mean differences (MD) were calculated as 24-week - baseline. Effect sizes are reported as Cohen’s D. RESULTS: From baseline to 24 weeks of ARSI, no changes in PF where observed in the 400 m walk [MD: +1.8 s; 95% CI (-13.3, -16.8); p = 0.822, d = 0.05], SPPB [+0.3 points; (-0.03, 0.8); p = 0.363, d = 0.27] or TUG [+0.3 s; (-0.6, 1.2); p = 0.512, d = 0.18]. For the secondary outcomes, no differences were observed for muscle function when assessing grip strength [-0.1 kg; (-2.3, 1.9); p = 0.874, d = 0.03] or mean power [-13 W; (-74, 48); p = 0.682, d = 0.13]. Peak power decreased by -11.8% [-102 W; (-228, 23); p = 0.134, d = 0.50] and lean mass by -2.8% [-1.6 kg; (-4.2, 1.1); p = 0.271, d = 0.31) with a 4.1% increase in balance [+3.0 pt; (-2.1, 8.1); p = 0.274, d = 0.29] that yielded small to moderate effect sizes but none reached statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to prior cross-sectional studies, these preliminary results suggest that 24 weeks of ARSI may not adversely affect objectively measured PF, nor any of our secondary outcomes associated with PF. As such, PF may be more stable during ARSI for hormone-sensitive PC than previously thought. However, the current sample size and possible learning effects in some tasks warrants caution and requires further investigation. This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute. Lauren C. Bates-Fraser is supported by the National Cancer Institute's National Research Service Award sponsored by the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of North Carolina (T32 CA116339).

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Hormonal and reproductive studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.