Is Occupational Physical Activity Associated With Cancer Mortality? A 27-year Prospective Study Of 404,249 Norwegian Participants

Cancer, the second leading global cause of death, is influenced by risk factors. However, the impact of occupational physical activity on the mortality risk for specific cancers is unclear. PURPOSE: To examine the association between occupational physical activity and mortality from various cancer sites. METHODS: We included 404,249 participants (aged 18-65 years, 51.8% men) from the Norwegian population-based health examination surveys. Occupational physical activity was measured through a self-reported questionnaire, and categorized into mostly sedentary or requiring walking, walking and lifting, and heavy labour. Fourteen different cancer sites previously associated with leisure-time physical activity (i.e., head and neck, myeloid leukaemia, myeloma, gastric cardia, lung, liver, endometrium, colon, breast, bladder, rectum, oesophagus, prostate, and kidney) were analyzed. Participants were followed from study entry (February 1972 to November 2002) to death or follow-up end (December 31, 2018), whichever came first. Multivariable-adjusted Fine and Gray sub distribution hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR)s and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 27.4 years (IQR 6.08), 18,150 (4.5%) participants died from cancer. Compared with a sedentary occupation, walking-and-lifting was associated with a 15% lower risk of breast cancer (HR = 0.85, 95%CI = 0.74 to 0.97). Conversely, both the walking and walking-and-lifting groups increased the risk of mortality from kidney cancer by 33 and 35%, respectively (HR = 1.33, 95%CI = 1.06 to 1.66; and HR = 1.35, 95%CI = 1.06 to 1.72, respectively) compared to the sedentary group. No significant associations were found for the other cancer sites or with heavy labour. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates a complex interplay between occupational physical activity and cancer mortality. While the walking and lifting group showed a potential protective effect in breast cancer mortality, the walking and walking and lifting groups observed an increased risk for kidney cancer mortality. These findings emphasize the need for nuanced investigations into the specific influences of different occupational activities on cancer outcomes, guiding future research and preventive measures. CC-S is supported by a grant from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska Curie grant agreement No 101028929

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001062264.21283.3e
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Occupational Physical Activity Associated With Cancer Mortality? A 27-year Prospective Study Of 404,249 Norwegian Participants

Miguel Adriano Sánchez-Lastra, Knut Eirik Dalene, Jakob Tarp, Cristina Cadenas‐Sánchez et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

Is Occupational Physical Activity Associated With Cancer Mortality? A 27-year Prospective Study Of 404,249 Norwegian Participants

Miguel Adriano Sánchez-Lastra, Knut Eirik Dalene, Jakob Tarp, Cristina Cadenas‐Sánchez, Ulf Ekelund
article en

Abstract

Cancer, the second leading global cause of death, is influenced by risk factors. However, the impact of occupational physical activity on the mortality risk for specific cancers is unclear. PURPOSE: To examine the association between occupational physical activity and mortality from various cancer sites. METHODS: We included 404,249 participants (aged 18-65 years, 51.8% men) from the Norwegian population-based health examination surveys. Occupational physical activity was measured through a self-reported questionnaire, and categorized into mostly sedentary or requiring walking, walking and lifting, and heavy labour. Fourteen different cancer sites previously associated with leisure-time physical activity (i.e., head and neck, myeloid leukaemia, myeloma, gastric cardia, lung, liver, endometrium, colon, breast, bladder, rectum, oesophagus, prostate, and kidney) were analyzed. Participants were followed from study entry (February 1972 to November 2002) to death or follow-up end (December 31, 2018), whichever came first. Multivariable-adjusted Fine and Gray sub distribution hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR)s and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 27.4 years (IQR 6.08), 18,150 (4.5%) participants died from cancer. Compared with a sedentary occupation, walking-and-lifting was associated with a 15% lower risk of breast cancer (HR = 0.85, 95%CI = 0.74 to 0.97). Conversely, both the walking and walking-and-lifting groups increased the risk of mortality from kidney cancer by 33 and 35%, respectively (HR = 1.33, 95%CI = 1.06 to 1.66; and HR = 1.35, 95%CI = 1.06 to 1.72, respectively) compared to the sedentary group. No significant associations were found for the other cancer sites or with heavy labour. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates a complex interplay between occupational physical activity and cancer mortality. While the walking and lifting group showed a potential protective effect in breast cancer mortality, the walking and walking and lifting groups observed an increased risk for kidney cancer mortality. These findings emphasize the need for nuanced investigations into the specific influences of different occupational activities on cancer outcomes, guiding future research and preventive measures. CC-S is supported by a grant from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska Curie grant agreement No 101028929

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO), Norwegian School of Sport Sciences (NO)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.