Comparison Of Polarized Vs Threshold Training For Vo2Max And Endurance Capacity Improvement In Wistar Rats

The superiority of Polarized Training (POL) vs other training models is questionable due to conflicting results. This could be surpassed by rigorously controlled experimental studies. PURPOSE: Our aim was to compare an eight-week POL vs Threshold Training (THR) protocol on maximal O2 uptake (VO2max) and endurance capacity (EC) in rats. METHODS: Fifteen male Wistar rats (336.1 ± 30.4 g) were divided in three groups: POL (n = 5), THR (n = 5), controls (CON, n = 5), housed in cages with running wheel, 12/12 h inverted light/dark cycle, 23oC, 50-60% humidity, with food and water ad libitum. After two-weeks of treadmill acclimatization, animals were tested for VO2max. The speed corresponding to 60 and 90% VO2max in POL and 50 and 75% VO2max in THR were determined. EC was assessed by a treadmill exhaustion test (10o slope, initial speed 25 m/min, 5 m/min increments every 15 min). Both groups underwent eight-week, 5d/w treadmill running. POL performed 12 min@90%VO2max + 48 min@60%VO2max (80% low intensity/20% high intensity) while THR performed 5 min@50%VO2max + 48 min@75%VO2max (moderate intensity). Training duration was adjusted between groups to ensure similar O2 uptake (POL = 3128 O2 L/day, THR = 3277 O2 L/day; p = .261). CON performed treadmill running 10 min/d, 10 m/min, 5d/w to equalize treadmill stress. At the end of the protocol animals were again assessed for VO2max and EC. RESULTS: At the beginning of the protocol there were no differences between groups in VO2max (p = .051) or EC (p = .069). Although there were no differences in VO2max between POL (80.6 ± 11.3 mL.Kg.min-1) and THR (82.6 ± 9.7 ml.Kg.min-1) at the end of training, VO2max was only higher in THR compared to CON (64.8 ± 2.9 mL.Kg.min-1; p = .042). Both POL (2056 ± 122 m; p < .01) and THR (2134 ± 413 m; p < .01) had a significantly higher EC compared to CON (823 ± 223 m) at the end of the training protocol, but there were no differences in EC between POL and THR. CONCLUSION: There were no differences in VO2max and EC between POL or THR after eight-weeks of training. FCT grants UID/DTP/00617/2020, LA/P/0064/2020 and PTDC/SAU-DES/4113/2020.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001056144.76005.b7
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison Of Polarized Vs Threshold Training For Vo2Max And Endurance Capacity Improvement In Wistar Rats

Pedro Ferreira Alves de Oliveira, Hélder Fonseca, Ariane Ethur Flores, Ana Isabel Padrão et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

Comparison Of Polarized Vs Threshold Training For Vo2Max And Endurance Capacity Improvement In Wistar Rats

Pedro Ferreira Alves de Oliveira, Hélder Fonseca, Ariane Ethur Flores, Ana Isabel Padrão, Miguel Anjos
article en

Abstract

The superiority of Polarized Training (POL) vs other training models is questionable due to conflicting results. This could be surpassed by rigorously controlled experimental studies. PURPOSE: Our aim was to compare an eight-week POL vs Threshold Training (THR) protocol on maximal O2 uptake (VO2max) and endurance capacity (EC) in rats. METHODS: Fifteen male Wistar rats (336.1 ± 30.4 g) were divided in three groups: POL (n = 5), THR (n = 5), controls (CON, n = 5), housed in cages with running wheel, 12/12 h inverted light/dark cycle, 23oC, 50-60% humidity, with food and water ad libitum. After two-weeks of treadmill acclimatization, animals were tested for VO2max. The speed corresponding to 60 and 90% VO2max in POL and 50 and 75% VO2max in THR were determined. EC was assessed by a treadmill exhaustion test (10o slope, initial speed 25 m/min, 5 m/min increments every 15 min). Both groups underwent eight-week, 5d/w treadmill running. POL performed 12 min@90%VO2max + 48 min@60%VO2max (80% low intensity/20% high intensity) while THR performed 5 min@50%VO2max + 48 min@75%VO2max (moderate intensity). Training duration was adjusted between groups to ensure similar O2 uptake (POL = 3128 O2 L/day, THR = 3277 O2 L/day; p = .261). CON performed treadmill running 10 min/d, 10 m/min, 5d/w to equalize treadmill stress. At the end of the protocol animals were again assessed for VO2max and EC. RESULTS: At the beginning of the protocol there were no differences between groups in VO2max (p = .051) or EC (p = .069). Although there were no differences in VO2max between POL (80.6 ± 11.3 mL.Kg.min-1) and THR (82.6 ± 9.7 ml.Kg.min-1) at the end of training, VO2max was only higher in THR compared to CON (64.8 ± 2.9 mL.Kg.min-1; p = .042). Both POL (2056 ± 122 m; p < .01) and THR (2134 ± 413 m; p < .01) had a significantly higher EC compared to CON (823 ± 223 m) at the end of the training protocol, but there were no differences in EC between POL and THR. CONCLUSION: There were no differences in VO2max and EC between POL or THR after eight-weeks of training. FCT grants UID/DTP/00617/2020, LA/P/0064/2020 and PTDC/SAU-DES/4113/2020.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Central Institute for the Deaf (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.