Exploring The Dose-response Relationship Between Estimated Resistance Training Proximity To Failure, Strength, And Muscle Hypertrophy

PURPOSE: To meta-analyze the aforementioned areas of relevant research, proximity to failure was quantified as the number of repetitions in reserve (RIR). METHODS: The RIR associated with each effect in the analysis was estimated based on the available descriptions of the training interventions in each study. Data were extracted and a series of exploratory multi-level meta-regressions were performed for outcomes related to both strength and muscle hypertrophy. All models were adjusted for the effects of load, method of volume equating, duration of intervention, and training status. RESULTS: The best fit models for both strength and muscle hypertrophy outcomes demonstrated modest quality of overall fit. In all of the best-fit models for strength, the confidence intervals of the marginal slopes for estimated RIR contained a null point estimate, indicating a negligible relationship with strength gains. However, in all of the best-fit models for muscle hypertrophy, the marginal slopes for estimated RIR were negative and their confidence intervals did not contain a null point estimate, indicating that changes in muscle size increased as sets were terminated closer to failure. CONCLUSIONS: The dose-response relationship between proximity to failure and strength gain appears to differ from the relationship with muscle hypertrophy, with only the latter being meaningfully influenced by RIR. Strength gains were similar across a wide range of RIR, while muscle hypertrophy improves as sets are terminated closer to failure. Considering the RIR estimation procedures used, however, the exact relationship between RIR and muscle hypertrophy and strength remains unclear. Researchers and practitioners should be aware that optimal proximity to failure may differ between strength and muscle hypertrophy outcomes, but caution is warranted when interpreting the present analysis due to its exploratory nature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001052720.32823.b1
Primary Topic
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring The Dose-response Relationship Between Estimated Resistance Training Proximity To Failure, Strength, And Muscle Hypertrophy

Ivan Jukić, Jacob F. Remmert, Martin C. Refalo, Zac P. Robinson et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
article

Exploring The Dose-response Relationship Between Estimated Resistance Training Proximity To Failure, Strength, And Muscle Hypertrophy

Ivan Jukić, Jacob F. Remmert, Martin C. Refalo, Zac P. Robinson, Joshua C. Pelland, Michael Christopher Zourdos, James Steele
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To meta-analyze the aforementioned areas of relevant research, proximity to failure was quantified as the number of repetitions in reserve (RIR). METHODS: The RIR associated with each effect in the analysis was estimated based on the available descriptions of the training interventions in each study. Data were extracted and a series of exploratory multi-level meta-regressions were performed for outcomes related to both strength and muscle hypertrophy. All models were adjusted for the effects of load, method of volume equating, duration of intervention, and training status. RESULTS: The best fit models for both strength and muscle hypertrophy outcomes demonstrated modest quality of overall fit. In all of the best-fit models for strength, the confidence intervals of the marginal slopes for estimated RIR contained a null point estimate, indicating a negligible relationship with strength gains. However, in all of the best-fit models for muscle hypertrophy, the marginal slopes for estimated RIR were negative and their confidence intervals did not contain a null point estimate, indicating that changes in muscle size increased as sets were terminated closer to failure. CONCLUSIONS: The dose-response relationship between proximity to failure and strength gain appears to differ from the relationship with muscle hypertrophy, with only the latter being meaningfully influenced by RIR. Strength gains were similar across a wide range of RIR, while muscle hypertrophy improves as sets are terminated closer to failure. Considering the RIR estimation procedures used, however, the exact relationship between RIR and muscle hypertrophy and strength remains unclear. Researchers and practitioners should be aware that optimal proximity to failure may differ between strength and muscle hypertrophy outcomes, but caution is warranted when interpreting the present analysis due to its exploratory nature.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Deakin University (AU), Southampton Solent University (GB), Auckland University of Technology (NZ), Florida Atlantic University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.