The Power Of Groups: Collective Effervescence Is Related To Group Fitness Participation

Collective effervescence—a psychological experience that may occur when one feels a sense of unity and shared emotion with a crowd (e.g., during concerts, church, or sporting events) —has not yet been explored in the group fitness domain. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine if the tendency to experience collective effervescence is higher among participants of group vs. independent fitness and if that leads to positive fitness outcomes. METHODS: Group fitness (GF; n = 97) and independent fitness (IF; n = 109) participants completed an online survey. Outcomes included collective effervescence tendency (Tendency to Engage in Effervescent Assembly Measure; TEAM), physical activity enjoyment (Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale; PAE), exercise commitment (Exercise Commitment Scale), and physical activity (World Health Organization’s Global Health Physical Activity Questionnaire). Mann Whitney U was used to analyze differences between groups. Mediation analysis was used to determine if TEAM mediated the relationship between GF participation and outcome variables. RESULTS: The GF group was older (41.6 ± 1.2 vs. 35.6 ± 0.8 years, p < 0.001) and had a greater (p < 0.001) proportion of women (85.6%) compared to the IF group (53.2%). Body Mass Index was similar (p > 0.05) between the groups (24.7 ± 0.3 and 24.4 ± 0.3 kg/m2, respectively). The GF group had higher TEAM and PAE scores (p < 0.001). With regards to exercise commitment, the GF group had a higher want to commit (p < 0.001), have to commit (p = 0.006), satisfaction (p < 0.001), personal investment (p < 0.001), social support (p < 0.001), and lower social constraints (p < 0.001), involvement alternatives (p < 0.001), and personal investment (p < 0.001) compared to the IF group. Moderate physical activity was similar between groups (154 ± 31 vs. 128 ± 11 min/week; GF vs. IF; p > 0.05), whereas vigorous activity was higher in the GF group (172 ± 15 vs. 82 ± 14 min/week; p < 0.001). Mediation analysis demonstrated that TEAM mediated the relationship between GF and exercise commitment (want to commit, satisfaction, social constraints, involvement alternatives, personal investment, and social support). CONCLUSION: Group fitness participants had higher TEAM, and in turn, higher exercise commitment. Future studies should explore exercise prescription based on TEAM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001056980.43215.0f
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Power Of Groups: Collective Effervescence Is Related To Group Fitness Participation

Shannon P. Lupien, Ariana F. Young, Jennifer L. Scheid
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

The Power Of Groups: Collective Effervescence Is Related To Group Fitness Participation

Shannon P. Lupien, Ariana F. Young, Jennifer L. Scheid
article en

Abstract

Collective effervescence—a psychological experience that may occur when one feels a sense of unity and shared emotion with a crowd (e.g., during concerts, church, or sporting events) —has not yet been explored in the group fitness domain. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to determine if the tendency to experience collective effervescence is higher among participants of group vs. independent fitness and if that leads to positive fitness outcomes. METHODS: Group fitness (GF; n = 97) and independent fitness (IF; n = 109) participants completed an online survey. Outcomes included collective effervescence tendency (Tendency to Engage in Effervescent Assembly Measure; TEAM), physical activity enjoyment (Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale; PAE), exercise commitment (Exercise Commitment Scale), and physical activity (World Health Organization’s Global Health Physical Activity Questionnaire). Mann Whitney U was used to analyze differences between groups. Mediation analysis was used to determine if TEAM mediated the relationship between GF participation and outcome variables. RESULTS: The GF group was older (41.6 ± 1.2 vs. 35.6 ± 0.8 years, p < 0.001) and had a greater (p < 0.001) proportion of women (85.6%) compared to the IF group (53.2%). Body Mass Index was similar (p > 0.05) between the groups (24.7 ± 0.3 and 24.4 ± 0.3 kg/m2, respectively). The GF group had higher TEAM and PAE scores (p < 0.001). With regards to exercise commitment, the GF group had a higher want to commit (p < 0.001), have to commit (p = 0.006), satisfaction (p < 0.001), personal investment (p < 0.001), social support (p < 0.001), and lower social constraints (p < 0.001), involvement alternatives (p < 0.001), and personal investment (p < 0.001) compared to the IF group. Moderate physical activity was similar between groups (154 ± 31 vs. 128 ± 11 min/week; GF vs. IF; p > 0.05), whereas vigorous activity was higher in the GF group (172 ± 15 vs. 82 ± 14 min/week; p < 0.001). Mediation analysis demonstrated that TEAM mediated the relationship between GF and exercise commitment (want to commit, satisfaction, social constraints, involvement alternatives, personal investment, and social support). CONCLUSION: Group fitness participants had higher TEAM, and in turn, higher exercise commitment. Future studies should explore exercise prescription based on TEAM.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Daemen College (US), California Lutheran University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.