Differences In Femur And Lumbar Vertebra Adaptations To Running And Swimming In Wistar Rat Models

Bone tissue adaptations to exercise are specific of the type of mechanical loading profile and, therefore, differ between different physical activities. PURPOSE: Our objective was to compare the long-term adaptive response of the femur and lumbar vertebra to running (weight-bearing activity; WB) and swimming (non-weight bearing activity; nWB) in young male Wistar rats. METHODS: Rats (n = 20, 3 months; 323 ± 20 g) were randomized into: i) WB (n = 10) housed in cages with running wheel or ii) nWB (n = 10) submitted to a swimming protocol, 2 h/day, 5d/week, for eight months. Body weight (BW), food intake and running wheel distance were recorded. At sacrifice, gastrocnemius and soleus muscles were removed and weighted. Lumbar vertebrae (L4-L5) and femur were also removed and analysed through micro-computed tomography and histology to determine microarchitecture, geometry and cellular density. Groups were compared by independent samples t-test. RESULTS: WB group ran approximately 9 km/week in the activity wheel. WB group presented higher BW (533.7 ± 48.1 vs 477.3 ± 47.7 g; p = .02) and pooled muscle mass (6.54 ± 0.47 vs 5.98 ± 0.32 g; p < .01) compared to nWB group despite food intake being similar between groups. At the femur, WB group displayed higher trabecular (0.435 ± 0.00 vs0.425 ± 0.01 g/cm3; p = .036) and cortical (1.469 ± 0.03 vs 1.437 ± 0.02 g/cm3; p = .019) volumetric bone mineral density, as well as higher cortical thickness (0.654 ± 0.03 vs 0.587 ± 0.03 mm; p = .001) and lower cortical porosity (3.26 ± 0.7 vs4.19 ± 0.35%; p < .01) compared to nWB group. Nonetheless, at the lumbar vertebra, it was the nWB group that displayed a lower trabecular separation (0.091 ± 0.0 vs 0.080 ± 0.0; p < .01) and higher trabecular connectivity (487.7 ± 151.0 vs1051.4 ± 370.0; p < 0.001) compared to the WB group. No differences were observed between groups or anatomical regions regarding osteocyte or osteoclast density. CONCLUSION: Site-dependent responses to different types of exercise were observed, with running being more effective to improve muscle mass and femur bone quality, whereas swimming was associated with positive effects mostly on the lumbar vertebra. CIAFEL is funded by FCT grant UID/DTP/00617/2020; ITR is funded by FCT grant LA/P/0064/2020. LF and AB are supported by FCT grants SFRH/BD/145211/2019 and MTS/SAS/0077/2020, respectively. Experiments were supported by FCT grant PTDC/SAU-DES/4113/2020

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001053020.23381.93
Primary Topic
Genetics and Physical Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences In Femur And Lumbar Vertebra Adaptations To Running And Swimming In Wistar Rat Models

Hélder Fonseca, Laura Freitas, Leonardo Yung dos Santos Maciel, María Gómez-Lázaro et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Genetics and Physical Performance
article

Differences In Femur And Lumbar Vertebra Adaptations To Running And Swimming In Wistar Rat Models

Hélder Fonseca, Laura Freitas, Leonardo Yung dos Santos Maciel, María Gómez-Lázaro, Andréa Bezerra, Ana I. Coelho
article en

Abstract

Bone tissue adaptations to exercise are specific of the type of mechanical loading profile and, therefore, differ between different physical activities. PURPOSE: Our objective was to compare the long-term adaptive response of the femur and lumbar vertebra to running (weight-bearing activity; WB) and swimming (non-weight bearing activity; nWB) in young male Wistar rats. METHODS: Rats (n = 20, 3 months; 323 ± 20 g) were randomized into: i) WB (n = 10) housed in cages with running wheel or ii) nWB (n = 10) submitted to a swimming protocol, 2 h/day, 5d/week, for eight months. Body weight (BW), food intake and running wheel distance were recorded. At sacrifice, gastrocnemius and soleus muscles were removed and weighted. Lumbar vertebrae (L4-L5) and femur were also removed and analysed through micro-computed tomography and histology to determine microarchitecture, geometry and cellular density. Groups were compared by independent samples t-test. RESULTS: WB group ran approximately 9 km/week in the activity wheel. WB group presented higher BW (533.7 ± 48.1 vs 477.3 ± 47.7 g; p = .02) and pooled muscle mass (6.54 ± 0.47 vs 5.98 ± 0.32 g; p < .01) compared to nWB group despite food intake being similar between groups. At the femur, WB group displayed higher trabecular (0.435 ± 0.00 vs0.425 ± 0.01 g/cm3; p = .036) and cortical (1.469 ± 0.03 vs 1.437 ± 0.02 g/cm3; p = .019) volumetric bone mineral density, as well as higher cortical thickness (0.654 ± 0.03 vs 0.587 ± 0.03 mm; p = .001) and lower cortical porosity (3.26 ± 0.7 vs4.19 ± 0.35%; p < .01) compared to nWB group. Nonetheless, at the lumbar vertebra, it was the nWB group that displayed a lower trabecular separation (0.091 ± 0.0 vs 0.080 ± 0.0; p < .01) and higher trabecular connectivity (487.7 ± 151.0 vs1051.4 ± 370.0; p < 0.001) compared to the WB group. No differences were observed between groups or anatomical regions regarding osteocyte or osteoclast density. CONCLUSION: Site-dependent responses to different types of exercise were observed, with running being more effective to improve muscle mass and femur bone quality, whereas swimming was associated with positive effects mostly on the lumbar vertebra. CIAFEL is funded by FCT grant UID/DTP/00617/2020; ITR is funded by FCT grant LA/P/0064/2020. LF and AB are supported by FCT grants SFRH/BD/145211/2019 and MTS/SAS/0077/2020, respectively. Experiments were supported by FCT grant PTDC/SAU-DES/4113/2020

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Universidade do Porto (PT), Universidade Federal de Sergipe (BR), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Genetics and Physical Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.