Understanding Reasons For Cannabis Use In Physically Active Adults: Evaluation Of Sex Differences

PURPOSE: The present study sought to determine sex differences in physically active adults in relation to how and why they are using cannabis (cannabidiol (CBD) and/or tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)). METHODS: Participants were recruited using email, social media, and word of mouth. Data collected included use of cannabis (CBD and/or THC) and reasons for cannabis use (psychological reasons, social reasons and non-specific reasons). Data were collected using a 36-item questionnaire on a 5-point Likert Scale (Never/Almost Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, Always/Almost Always). Differences between men and women were assessed with a Mann-Whitney U nonparametric test. RESULTS: A total of 72 participants completed the questionnaire. All participants were physically active for more than five years, with most participants (42%) engaging in 30-150 minutes of exercise per week. Men (Mean = >300 minutes per week) engaged in significantly more minutes of weekly exercise compared to women (Mean = 30-150 minutes per week) (U = 468, p = 0.029, r = 0.25). There were no differences between men and women regarding psychological reasons, social reasons, or non-specific reasons for consuming CBD. However, there were differences in reasons for THC use. Regarding psychological reasons, men (Mdn: 2.50), compared to women (Mdn: 3.00), were less likely to consume THC to forget their worries (U = 274.0, p = 0.042, r = 0.275). Additionally, men (Mdn: 3.00), compared to women (Mdn: 4.00), were less likely to consume THC because it helped when feeling depressed or nervous (U = 254.0, p = 0.020, r = 0.312), and to forget about their problems (men Mdn: 2.00, women Mdn: 3.00; U = 262.5, p = 0.028, r = 0.294). Social reasons also differed between sexes for THC use such that men (Mdn: 1.00), compared to women (Mdn: 1.00) were less likely to consume THC to fit in with the group they like (U = 310.0, p = 0.027, r = 0.295). Non-specific reasons for cannabis use demonstrated that men (Mdn: 3.00), compared to women (Mdn: 3.00) were less likely to consume THC to increase creativity and originality (U = 257.5, p = 0.023, r = 0.300), and to understand things differently (U = 263.0, p = 0.029, r = 0.292). CONCLUSIONS: The data also suggested that physically active men and women use cannabis for different reasons. Future studies should work to examine if cannabis alters these parameters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001056964.42444.eb
Primary Topic
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Reasons For Cannabis Use In Physically Active Adults: Evaluation Of Sex Differences

Emily K. Erb, Stacie M. Humm, Anthony G. Pinzone, J. Derek Kingsley et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
article

Understanding Reasons For Cannabis Use In Physically Active Adults: Evaluation Of Sex Differences

Emily K. Erb, Stacie M. Humm, Anthony G. Pinzone, J. Derek Kingsley, Sarah G. Kearney
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: The present study sought to determine sex differences in physically active adults in relation to how and why they are using cannabis (cannabidiol (CBD) and/or tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)). METHODS: Participants were recruited using email, social media, and word of mouth. Data collected included use of cannabis (CBD and/or THC) and reasons for cannabis use (psychological reasons, social reasons and non-specific reasons). Data were collected using a 36-item questionnaire on a 5-point Likert Scale (Never/Almost Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, Always/Almost Always). Differences between men and women were assessed with a Mann-Whitney U nonparametric test. RESULTS: A total of 72 participants completed the questionnaire. All participants were physically active for more than five years, with most participants (42%) engaging in 30-150 minutes of exercise per week. Men (Mean = >300 minutes per week) engaged in significantly more minutes of weekly exercise compared to women (Mean = 30-150 minutes per week) (U = 468, p = 0.029, r = 0.25). There were no differences between men and women regarding psychological reasons, social reasons, or non-specific reasons for consuming CBD. However, there were differences in reasons for THC use. Regarding psychological reasons, men (Mdn: 2.50), compared to women (Mdn: 3.00), were less likely to consume THC to forget their worries (U = 274.0, p = 0.042, r = 0.275). Additionally, men (Mdn: 3.00), compared to women (Mdn: 4.00), were less likely to consume THC because it helped when feeling depressed or nervous (U = 254.0, p = 0.020, r = 0.312), and to forget about their problems (men Mdn: 2.00, women Mdn: 3.00; U = 262.5, p = 0.028, r = 0.294). Social reasons also differed between sexes for THC use such that men (Mdn: 1.00), compared to women (Mdn: 1.00) were less likely to consume THC to fit in with the group they like (U = 310.0, p = 0.027, r = 0.295). Non-specific reasons for cannabis use demonstrated that men (Mdn: 3.00), compared to women (Mdn: 3.00) were less likely to consume THC to increase creativity and originality (U = 257.5, p = 0.023, r = 0.300), and to understand things differently (U = 263.0, p = 0.029, r = 0.292). CONCLUSIONS: The data also suggested that physically active men and women use cannabis for different reasons. Future studies should work to examine if cannabis alters these parameters.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Kent State University (US), Grand Valley State University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.