Running Economy And Biomechanics Of Sub-elite To Elite Distance Runners Wearing “Super” Spikes

“Super” spikes refer to track spikes constructed with increased underfoot cushioning, highly compliant and lightweight midsole foams, and rigid nylon plates spanning the shoe sole length. Similarly constructed “super” shoes have reduced the metabolic cost of running (economy) by 2.7-4.2% compared to previous generations of footwear. This improvement in economy may be due to the polyether block amide (PEBA) midsole foams used in “super” shoe and spikes and the influence on peak vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) and leg stiffness while running. Despite many studies on running economy while wearing “super” shoes, the effects of wearing “super” spikes on running economy is unknown. PURPOSE: To compare running economy and biomechanics of sub-elite to elite runners at sub-threshold effort in “super” spikes, traditional spikes, and “super” shoes. METHODS: 3 male and 3 female sub-elite to elite distance runners (10 k time < 32 & 39 min, respectively) ran eight 5-min trials (4 shoes with 2 replicates) at 15 km/h for women and 17 km/h for men in two “super” spikes (ND and OC), a traditional spike (NV), and a “super” shoe (VF) during two sessions. We calculated gross metabolic power (W/kg), peak vGRF, and leg stiffness during the last 2 min of each trial. RESULTS: We found no statistical differences (p ≥ .07) in the change in metabolic power, peak vGRF, or leg stiffness between shoe conditions. However, numerically we found running economy improved by 1.33%, 1.25%, and 1.33% while using the ND, OC, and VF, respectively, compared to the NV. Peak vGRF and leg stiffness values for ND, OC, VF, and NV were 2.92, 2.93, 2.93, and 2.93 body weights, and 17.20, 17.34, 17.44, and 17.30 kN/m. CONCLUSION: Based on the data thus far, runners wearing “super” shoes or spikes may improve running economy compared to traditional track spikes. This improvement in economy could potentially lead to 0.86% faster race times over 5000 m for runners competing in “super” spikes compared to traditional spikes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001057696.68959.e7
Primary Topic
Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Running Economy And Biomechanics Of Sub-elite To Elite Distance Runners Wearing “Super” Spikes

Bradley J. Needles
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
article

Running Economy And Biomechanics Of Sub-elite To Elite Distance Runners Wearing “Super” Spikes

Bradley J. Needles
article en

Abstract

“Super” spikes refer to track spikes constructed with increased underfoot cushioning, highly compliant and lightweight midsole foams, and rigid nylon plates spanning the shoe sole length. Similarly constructed “super” shoes have reduced the metabolic cost of running (economy) by 2.7-4.2% compared to previous generations of footwear. This improvement in economy may be due to the polyether block amide (PEBA) midsole foams used in “super” shoe and spikes and the influence on peak vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) and leg stiffness while running. Despite many studies on running economy while wearing “super” shoes, the effects of wearing “super” spikes on running economy is unknown. PURPOSE: To compare running economy and biomechanics of sub-elite to elite runners at sub-threshold effort in “super” spikes, traditional spikes, and “super” shoes. METHODS: 3 male and 3 female sub-elite to elite distance runners (10 k time < 32 & 39 min, respectively) ran eight 5-min trials (4 shoes with 2 replicates) at 15 km/h for women and 17 km/h for men in two “super” spikes (ND and OC), a traditional spike (NV), and a “super” shoe (VF) during two sessions. We calculated gross metabolic power (W/kg), peak vGRF, and leg stiffness during the last 2 min of each trial. RESULTS: We found no statistical differences (p ≥ .07) in the change in metabolic power, peak vGRF, or leg stiffness between shoe conditions. However, numerically we found running economy improved by 1.33%, 1.25%, and 1.33% while using the ND, OC, and VF, respectively, compared to the NV. Peak vGRF and leg stiffness values for ND, OC, VF, and NV were 2.92, 2.93, 2.93, and 2.93 body weights, and 17.20, 17.34, 17.44, and 17.30 kN/m. CONCLUSION: Based on the data thus far, runners wearing “super” shoes or spikes may improve running economy compared to traditional track spikes. This improvement in economy could potentially lead to 0.86% faster race times over 5000 m for runners competing in “super” spikes compared to traditional spikes.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Running Economy And Biomechanics Of Sub-elite To Elite Distance Runners Wearing “Super” Spikes — Bradley J. Needles · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS