Maternal Metabolic Limits In Endurance Athletes During Pregnancy

In pregnancy, mothers face increasing energy demands to support fetal growth. Previous studies have proposed a limit to sustained energy metabolism in humans (~2.5× basal metabolic rate, BMR; kilocalories/day). It is unclear if pregnancy, particularly coupled with high levels of physical activity, pushes maternal energy expenditure beyond the metabolic limit. PURPOSE: We hypothesize that there is a metabolic limit to maternal energy expenditure, ~2.5× preconception BMR, which is not surpassed during pregnancy. METHODS: We recruited 12 female endurance athletes (mean age: 32.6 ± 2.0 years, mean preconception BMI: 21.5 ± 2.8) planning to conceive or in early pregnancy (<17 weeks) who self-reported >300 minutes/week of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) before conception, including >32 kilometers/week of running. We measured total energy expenditure (TEE; kilocalories/day) using the doubly labeled water method in early pregnancy (0-17 weeks) and in the third trimester (32-34 weeks). MVPA was measured using ActiGraph accelerometers and Withings fitness trackers. Body composition was measured using the doubly labeled water method and Withings scales. Statistical analyses included paired t-tests and linear regression. RESULTS: Mean gestational weight gain was 12.7 ± 4.2 kilograms. Weekly running distance decreased from early pregnancy (51.4 ± 20.9 kilometers/week) to the third trimester (25.3 ± 33.8 kilometers/week) (p = 0.002), while weekly MVPA was largely maintained (682.3 ± 169.1 minutes/week vs. 565.6 ± 178.3 minutes/week; p = 0.05). Mean metabolic scope (TEE/estimated preconception BMR) increased from 2.01 ± 0.31 in early pregnancy to 2.23 ± 0.30 in the third trimester (p = 0.001). In linear regression models accounting for age and gestational age, third trimester metabolic scope showed non-significant, negative trends with both weekly rate of weight gain in the third trimester (β = -0.25, p > 0.05) and total gestational weight gain (β = -1.27, p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: These results support the existence of a maternal metabolic limit, even in conditions of high energy demands due to physical activity, which may shape gestational weight gain and pregnancy outcomes in endurance athletes. This study was funded by The National Science Foundation (BA-DDRIG #2316583), The Leakey Foundation, and the Triangle Center for Evolutionary Medicine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001052624.20724.0e
Primary Topic
Birth, Development, and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maternal Metabolic Limits In Endurance Athletes During Pregnancy

Srishti Sadhir, Zane S. Swanson, Amanda McGrosky, Herman Pontzer et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Birth, Development, and Health
article

Maternal Metabolic Limits In Endurance Athletes During Pregnancy

Srishti Sadhir, Zane S. Swanson, Amanda McGrosky, Herman Pontzer, Keri Tomechko
article en

Abstract

In pregnancy, mothers face increasing energy demands to support fetal growth. Previous studies have proposed a limit to sustained energy metabolism in humans (~2.5× basal metabolic rate, BMR; kilocalories/day). It is unclear if pregnancy, particularly coupled with high levels of physical activity, pushes maternal energy expenditure beyond the metabolic limit. PURPOSE: We hypothesize that there is a metabolic limit to maternal energy expenditure, ~2.5× preconception BMR, which is not surpassed during pregnancy. METHODS: We recruited 12 female endurance athletes (mean age: 32.6 ± 2.0 years, mean preconception BMI: 21.5 ± 2.8) planning to conceive or in early pregnancy (<17 weeks) who self-reported >300 minutes/week of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) before conception, including >32 kilometers/week of running. We measured total energy expenditure (TEE; kilocalories/day) using the doubly labeled water method in early pregnancy (0-17 weeks) and in the third trimester (32-34 weeks). MVPA was measured using ActiGraph accelerometers and Withings fitness trackers. Body composition was measured using the doubly labeled water method and Withings scales. Statistical analyses included paired t-tests and linear regression. RESULTS: Mean gestational weight gain was 12.7 ± 4.2 kilograms. Weekly running distance decreased from early pregnancy (51.4 ± 20.9 kilometers/week) to the third trimester (25.3 ± 33.8 kilometers/week) (p = 0.002), while weekly MVPA was largely maintained (682.3 ± 169.1 minutes/week vs. 565.6 ± 178.3 minutes/week; p = 0.05). Mean metabolic scope (TEE/estimated preconception BMR) increased from 2.01 ± 0.31 in early pregnancy to 2.23 ± 0.30 in the third trimester (p = 0.001). In linear regression models accounting for age and gestational age, third trimester metabolic scope showed non-significant, negative trends with both weekly rate of weight gain in the third trimester (β = -0.25, p > 0.05) and total gestational weight gain (β = -1.27, p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: These results support the existence of a maternal metabolic limit, even in conditions of high energy demands due to physical activity, which may shape gestational weight gain and pregnancy outcomes in endurance athletes. This study was funded by The National Science Foundation (BA-DDRIG #2316583), The Leakey Foundation, and the Triangle Center for Evolutionary Medicine.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Center for Strategic and International Studies (US), Duke University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Birth, Development, and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.