Joint Biomechanics In Transfemoral Amputees With A Socket-based Versus Osseointegrated Prosthesis: A Pilot Study

Lower-extremity amputees commonly use socket-based (SO) prostheses. Osseointegration (OI), which anchors the prosthesis abutment directly to the residual bone, may be recommended for SO users facing poor gait outcomes, skin irritation, and an insecure fit. Although OI improves SO users’ gait over time, it is unknown if high-functioning SO users (K-level ≥ 3) without current OI prescriptions exhibit distinct gait outcomes compared to those with OI. Distinct gait outcomes between these groups could inform the potential need for OI in high functioning SO users not currently prescribed it. PURPOSE: Compare joint biomechanics between high functioning (K-level ≥ 3) transfemoral amputees with an SO versus OI prosthesis. METHODS: 2 male, high functioning, unilateral transfemoral amputees with an OI prosthesis (age: 58 ± 14.14 yr, body mass: 128.78 ± 24.34 kg, height: 1.82 ± 0.09 m) and 3 with an SO prosthesis (age: 45.66 ± 18.55 yr, body mass: 93.42 ± 2.97 kg, height: 1.83 ± 0.06 m) volunteered. Stance phase joint biomechanics for the intact limb were calculated using 3D motion capture and force plate data as subjects walked at a self-selected speed along a 15-m level walkway. Sagittal ankle, knee, and hip angle, moment, and power, and frontal knee and hip angle and moment waveforms were compared between groups qualitatively and via 1D statistical parametric mapping with two samples independent t-tests (ɑ ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: Both groups walked at similar speeds. Joint angles, moments, and powers were statistically similar between groups (p > 0.05). Qualitatively, OI users generated less sagittal ankle power and hip moments (Figure 1). CONCLUSIONS: We are recruiting a larger sample that may statistically reveal less ankle and hip mechanical output in OI than high-functioning SO users not currently prescribed OI. If confirmed, these findings suggest the potential for improved gait outcomes like reduced joint loads through OI among high functioning SO users without OI prescriptions.US Department of Defense

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001057624.78666.4c
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Joint Biomechanics In Transfemoral Amputees With A Socket-based Versus Osseointegrated Prosthesis: A Pilot Study

Jae Kun Shim, Gauri A. Desai, Ross H. Miller, John R. Pope
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

Joint Biomechanics In Transfemoral Amputees With A Socket-based Versus Osseointegrated Prosthesis: A Pilot Study

Jae Kun Shim, Gauri A. Desai, Ross H. Miller, John R. Pope
article en

Abstract

Lower-extremity amputees commonly use socket-based (SO) prostheses. Osseointegration (OI), which anchors the prosthesis abutment directly to the residual bone, may be recommended for SO users facing poor gait outcomes, skin irritation, and an insecure fit. Although OI improves SO users’ gait over time, it is unknown if high-functioning SO users (K-level ≥ 3) without current OI prescriptions exhibit distinct gait outcomes compared to those with OI. Distinct gait outcomes between these groups could inform the potential need for OI in high functioning SO users not currently prescribed it. PURPOSE: Compare joint biomechanics between high functioning (K-level ≥ 3) transfemoral amputees with an SO versus OI prosthesis. METHODS: 2 male, high functioning, unilateral transfemoral amputees with an OI prosthesis (age: 58 ± 14.14 yr, body mass: 128.78 ± 24.34 kg, height: 1.82 ± 0.09 m) and 3 with an SO prosthesis (age: 45.66 ± 18.55 yr, body mass: 93.42 ± 2.97 kg, height: 1.83 ± 0.06 m) volunteered. Stance phase joint biomechanics for the intact limb were calculated using 3D motion capture and force plate data as subjects walked at a self-selected speed along a 15-m level walkway. Sagittal ankle, knee, and hip angle, moment, and power, and frontal knee and hip angle and moment waveforms were compared between groups qualitatively and via 1D statistical parametric mapping with two samples independent t-tests (ɑ ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: Both groups walked at similar speeds. Joint angles, moments, and powers were statistically similar between groups (p > 0.05). Qualitatively, OI users generated less sagittal ankle power and hip moments (Figure 1). CONCLUSIONS: We are recruiting a larger sample that may statistically reveal less ankle and hip mechanical output in OI than high-functioning SO users not currently prescribed OI. If confirmed, these findings suggest the potential for improved gait outcomes like reduced joint loads through OI among high functioning SO users without OI prescriptions.US Department of Defense

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.