Countermovement Jump Force Plate Kinetics In Collegiate Athletes With Overuse Injury Symptoms

PURPOSE: Countermovement jump (CMJ) testing is common to assess athlete health status and performance capability, but there is minimal empirical data to indicate which CMJ outcome measures will aid in determining health status. The purpose of this study is to determine the differences in CMJ outcome measures between collegiate athletes complaining of no, mild, moderate, and severe overuse symptoms. METHODS: Ninety-four collegiate athletes (F = 59, M = 35, age: 21.3 ± 1.7 years, height: 174.2 ± 8.7 cm, mass: 71.7 ± 8.0 kg) participated in preseason and midseason testing around their fall competitive season. Participants completed three CMJ trials on a triaxial force plate and then completed the Oslo Sports Trauma Research Centre Overuse Injury Scale (OSTRC). Twenty-two outcome measures were captured from the CMJ trials and used for analysis. Participants were grouped via outcome scores on the OSTRC into groups of no symptoms (OSTRC = 0), mild symptoms (OSTRC = 1-14), moderate symptoms (OSTRC = 15-28), or severe symptoms (OSTRC = 28-100). The CMJ outcome scores were compared across the groups with linear mixed models, and sex and OSTRC group were predictor variables. Participant mass was used as a covariate for all analyses. RESULTS: There was a significant interaction between sex and OSTRC group for jump height by flight time (F = 3.08, p = 0.029). Females with severe symptoms demonstrated lower jump height compared to those with mild problems (t = 2.76, p = 0.034) and moderate problems (t = 2.99, p = 0.018). Peak force was significant different across OSTRC groups regardless of sex, with the no problems group demonstrating the lower peak force compared to the moderate group (t = 2.94, p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Jump height demonstrates to be predictive of changes in OSTRC in females and is different between participants when they demonstrate different OSTRC symptoms. Peak force was also different between groups, with those with no symptoms demonstrating less force, despite getting similar jump heights. Individuals with no symptoms may be more efficient with their movement, thus allowing them to get to higher jump heights despite lower force. Overall, more studies need to be performed to ensure that CMJ outcome measures are predictive of health status before deploying this testing widely in clinical care. NATA New Investigator #2021NIP01

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001061852.85989.ef
Primary Topic
Sports injuries and prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Countermovement Jump Force Plate Kinetics In Collegiate Athletes With Overuse Injury Symptoms

Brett S. Pexa, Kevin R. Ford, Jeffry B. Taylor
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Sports injuries and prevention
article

Countermovement Jump Force Plate Kinetics In Collegiate Athletes With Overuse Injury Symptoms

Brett S. Pexa, Kevin R. Ford, Jeffry B. Taylor
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Countermovement jump (CMJ) testing is common to assess athlete health status and performance capability, but there is minimal empirical data to indicate which CMJ outcome measures will aid in determining health status. The purpose of this study is to determine the differences in CMJ outcome measures between collegiate athletes complaining of no, mild, moderate, and severe overuse symptoms. METHODS: Ninety-four collegiate athletes (F = 59, M = 35, age: 21.3 ± 1.7 years, height: 174.2 ± 8.7 cm, mass: 71.7 ± 8.0 kg) participated in preseason and midseason testing around their fall competitive season. Participants completed three CMJ trials on a triaxial force plate and then completed the Oslo Sports Trauma Research Centre Overuse Injury Scale (OSTRC). Twenty-two outcome measures were captured from the CMJ trials and used for analysis. Participants were grouped via outcome scores on the OSTRC into groups of no symptoms (OSTRC = 0), mild symptoms (OSTRC = 1-14), moderate symptoms (OSTRC = 15-28), or severe symptoms (OSTRC = 28-100). The CMJ outcome scores were compared across the groups with linear mixed models, and sex and OSTRC group were predictor variables. Participant mass was used as a covariate for all analyses. RESULTS: There was a significant interaction between sex and OSTRC group for jump height by flight time (F = 3.08, p = 0.029). Females with severe symptoms demonstrated lower jump height compared to those with mild problems (t = 2.76, p = 0.034) and moderate problems (t = 2.99, p = 0.018). Peak force was significant different across OSTRC groups regardless of sex, with the no problems group demonstrating the lower peak force compared to the moderate group (t = 2.94, p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Jump height demonstrates to be predictive of changes in OSTRC in females and is different between participants when they demonstrate different OSTRC symptoms. Peak force was also different between groups, with those with no symptoms demonstrating less force, despite getting similar jump heights. Individuals with no symptoms may be more efficient with their movement, thus allowing them to get to higher jump heights despite lower force. Overall, more studies need to be performed to ensure that CMJ outcome measures are predictive of health status before deploying this testing widely in clinical care. NATA New Investigator #2021NIP01

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
High Point University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Sports injuries and prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.