Assessing The Differences Between Chewing And Swallowing Arugula Extract Capsules On The Concentrations Of Nitric Oxide Metabolites In Metabolically Healthy Males

Previous literature has examined the benefits of consuming nitrate (NO3)-rich crops (e.g., beetroot, spinach, watercress, arugula) on endothelial function due to their positive influence on nitric oxide (NO) production from the utilization of NO3-reducing bacteria in the oral microbiome. However, there has yet to be a study addressing how the method of consumption may influence the role the oral microbiome plays in the degradation of NO3 to NO from consuming an encapsulated NO3-rich crop. PURPOSE: To determine the differences in NO metabolite concentrations following two different methods (e.g., chewing, swallowing) of consuming the encapsulated arugula extract. METHODS: Eight, metabolically healthy males (age = 23 ± 3.2 yrs, %BF = 16.1 ± 4.7) were recruited for this study. Participants were determined to be metabolically healthy through several blood screen panels (e.g., metabolic, lipid, complete blood cell count) following an overnight fast. All participants were randomized and counterbalanced for two conditions (e.g., chewing and swallowing), separated by a 72-HR washout period. Following an overnight fast, participants were asked to either swallow the arugula extract capsules (2; 100mg NO3) or chew the arugula extract capsules (2; 100mg NO3) until the contents were dispersed into their mouth (15 seconds) and then swallowed. Blood samples were obtained at 4 time points for each condition (e.g., pre, 1-HR, 2-HR, and 3-HR proceeding ingestion). Data were analyzed using a 2 x 4 repeated measures ANOVA to assess differences in NO metabolite concentrations [(total NO, NO3, and nitrite (NO2)]. RESULTS: Total NO and NO3 concentrations significantly increased from baseline to 1-HR when chewing (NO: p = .008; NO3: p = .011) but not for swallowing. Correspondingly, chewing demonstrated a significantly larger increase 1-HR after ingestion compared to swallowing (F = 13.799, p = .008). However, 2-HRs after swallowing, both total NO and NO3 significantly rose (NO: p = .005; NO3: p < .001) to a similar level as chewing (F = .759, p = .413). CONCLUSION: Regardless of chewing or swallowing the arugula extract, both showed similar increases 2-HR after consumption. However, chewing displayed a significantly larger increase in total NO metabolites after 1-HR, indicating the need for a potentially longer assessment duration. Rucola Health

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001056876.46942.4a
Primary Topic
Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing The Differences Between Chewing And Swallowing Arugula Extract Capsules On The Concentrations Of Nitric Oxide Metabolites In Metabolically Healthy Males

Ricardo Torres, Andrew R. Gallucci, Jeffrey S. Forsse, Jeffery L. Heileson et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
article

Assessing The Differences Between Chewing And Swallowing Arugula Extract Capsules On The Concentrations Of Nitric Oxide Metabolites In Metabolically Healthy Males

Ricardo Torres, Andrew R. Gallucci, Jeffrey S. Forsse, Jeffery L. Heileson, Tomas J. Chapman-Lopez, Rodney X. Sturdivant, LesLee Funderburk, Dylan T. Wilburn, Leroy K. Bolden
article en

Abstract

Previous literature has examined the benefits of consuming nitrate (NO3)-rich crops (e.g., beetroot, spinach, watercress, arugula) on endothelial function due to their positive influence on nitric oxide (NO) production from the utilization of NO3-reducing bacteria in the oral microbiome. However, there has yet to be a study addressing how the method of consumption may influence the role the oral microbiome plays in the degradation of NO3 to NO from consuming an encapsulated NO3-rich crop. PURPOSE: To determine the differences in NO metabolite concentrations following two different methods (e.g., chewing, swallowing) of consuming the encapsulated arugula extract. METHODS: Eight, metabolically healthy males (age = 23 ± 3.2 yrs, %BF = 16.1 ± 4.7) were recruited for this study. Participants were determined to be metabolically healthy through several blood screen panels (e.g., metabolic, lipid, complete blood cell count) following an overnight fast. All participants were randomized and counterbalanced for two conditions (e.g., chewing and swallowing), separated by a 72-HR washout period. Following an overnight fast, participants were asked to either swallow the arugula extract capsules (2; 100mg NO3) or chew the arugula extract capsules (2; 100mg NO3) until the contents were dispersed into their mouth (15 seconds) and then swallowed. Blood samples were obtained at 4 time points for each condition (e.g., pre, 1-HR, 2-HR, and 3-HR proceeding ingestion). Data were analyzed using a 2 x 4 repeated measures ANOVA to assess differences in NO metabolite concentrations [(total NO, NO3, and nitrite (NO2)]. RESULTS: Total NO and NO3 concentrations significantly increased from baseline to 1-HR when chewing (NO: p = .008; NO3: p = .011) but not for swallowing. Correspondingly, chewing demonstrated a significantly larger increase 1-HR after ingestion compared to swallowing (F = 13.799, p = .008). However, 2-HRs after swallowing, both total NO and NO3 significantly rose (NO: p = .005; NO3: p < .001) to a similar level as chewing (F = .759, p = .413). CONCLUSION: Regardless of chewing or swallowing the arugula extract, both showed similar increases 2-HR after consumption. However, chewing displayed a significantly larger increase in total NO metabolites after 1-HR, indicating the need for a potentially longer assessment duration. Rucola Health

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Baylor University (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.