Characterization Of Physical And Cognitive Performance And Hydration In Older Adults.

In younger adults, dehydration has been shown to impair physical and cognitive performance. Older adults are habitually hypohydrated alongside experiencing physical and cognitive performance deficits. Despite these deficits, the link between these factors remains unexplored. PURPOSE: To examine the effect of hydration status on physical and cognitive performance in older adults. METHODS: Sixteen (5 men and 11 women) community-dwelling adults (74 ± 7 yr; 78.2 ± 15.0 kg; 161 ± 11 cm) completed measurements of hydration status (urine specific gravity [USG], urine color), bioelectrical impedance analysis (lean mass, fat mass, total body fluid, intracellular to extracellular fluid ratio [ICF: ECF]), blood pressure, physical performance (handgrip strength test, sit-to-stand test, and a timed-up-and-go test), and reaction time (Flanker task). Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed on the distance matrix of USG and urine color to group participants. One-way ANOVAs were performed to determine differences among groups. RESULTS: Hierarchical cluster analysis assigned participants to 4 groups (group1, n = 3; group2, n = 4; group3, n = 5; group4,n = 4). Consistent with the cluster analysis, each group had significantly (p < 0.001) different urine color (group1: 1.0 ± 0.0, group2: 2.3 ± 0.3, group3: 4.2 ± 0.4, group4, 6.0 ± 0.0). In addition, the reaction time was significantly different among groups. For group1, compatible and incompatible tasks (compatible: 1116 ± 71.7 s, p = 0.049; incompatible: 1205 ± 13.4 ms, p = 0.042) had a longer response time compared to group2 (compatible: 640 ± 67.5 ms; incompatible: 688 ± 74.0 ms), group3 (compatible: 725 ± 67.4 ms; incompatible: 796 ± 174.2 ms), and group4 (compatible: 731 ± 139.8 ms; incompatible: 782 ± 122.7 ms). No significant differences were observed for lean mass, fat mass, total body fluid, ICF:ECF, blood pressure, handgrip strength, sit-to-stand test, and time-up-and-go test. CONCLUSIONS: Despite grouping by USG and urine color, no relationship was observed between body composition and physical performance. Surprisingly, hydrated individuals performed poorly cognitively compared to less hydrated individuals. We suggest these differences may reflect varying individual cognitive functions, not hydration status, among free-living older adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0001062216.67187.0e
Primary Topic
Health and Well-being Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterization Of Physical And Cognitive Performance And Hydration In Older Adults.

Lawrence Corey, Hui‐Ying Luk, Jarrod Blinch, Yasuki Sekiguchi et al.
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Health and Well-being Studies
article

Characterization Of Physical And Cognitive Performance And Hydration In Older Adults.

Lawrence Corey, Hui‐Ying Luk, Jarrod Blinch, Yasuki Sekiguchi, Casey R. Appell, Alan T. Ky, Cherish A. Keeney, Nigel C. Jiwan, Ruben E. Moya
article en

Abstract

In younger adults, dehydration has been shown to impair physical and cognitive performance. Older adults are habitually hypohydrated alongside experiencing physical and cognitive performance deficits. Despite these deficits, the link between these factors remains unexplored. PURPOSE: To examine the effect of hydration status on physical and cognitive performance in older adults. METHODS: Sixteen (5 men and 11 women) community-dwelling adults (74 ± 7 yr; 78.2 ± 15.0 kg; 161 ± 11 cm) completed measurements of hydration status (urine specific gravity [USG], urine color), bioelectrical impedance analysis (lean mass, fat mass, total body fluid, intracellular to extracellular fluid ratio [ICF: ECF]), blood pressure, physical performance (handgrip strength test, sit-to-stand test, and a timed-up-and-go test), and reaction time (Flanker task). Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed on the distance matrix of USG and urine color to group participants. One-way ANOVAs were performed to determine differences among groups. RESULTS: Hierarchical cluster analysis assigned participants to 4 groups (group1, n = 3; group2, n = 4; group3, n = 5; group4,n = 4). Consistent with the cluster analysis, each group had significantly (p < 0.001) different urine color (group1: 1.0 ± 0.0, group2: 2.3 ± 0.3, group3: 4.2 ± 0.4, group4, 6.0 ± 0.0). In addition, the reaction time was significantly different among groups. For group1, compatible and incompatible tasks (compatible: 1116 ± 71.7 s, p = 0.049; incompatible: 1205 ± 13.4 ms, p = 0.042) had a longer response time compared to group2 (compatible: 640 ± 67.5 ms; incompatible: 688 ± 74.0 ms), group3 (compatible: 725 ± 67.4 ms; incompatible: 796 ± 174.2 ms), and group4 (compatible: 731 ± 139.8 ms; incompatible: 782 ± 122.7 ms). No significant differences were observed for lean mass, fat mass, total body fluid, ICF:ECF, blood pressure, handgrip strength, sit-to-stand test, and time-up-and-go test. CONCLUSIONS: Despite grouping by USG and urine color, no relationship was observed between body composition and physical performance. Surprisingly, hydrated individuals performed poorly cognitively compared to less hydrated individuals. We suggest these differences may reflect varying individual cognitive functions, not hydration status, among free-living older adults.

Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseVol. 56(10S)
Texas Tech University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Health and Well-being Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.