Determinants of digital well-being

Abstract How can people lead fulfilling lives both thanks to and despite the constant use of digital media and artificial intelligence? While the prevailing narrative often portrays these technologies as generally harmful to well-being, the reality is of course more nuanced—some individuals benefit, while others do not. Existing research has predominantly focused on the general consequences of digital media on well-being, with less attention given to the individual-level antecedents of digital well-being. In the present study, we aimed to identify the traits and characteristics of individuals who use digital tools in ways that promote their well-being. Using a large representative sample from Sweden ( N = 1999), we explore how digital self-control, digital literacy (objective and subjective), and digital information ignorance predict digital well-being, life satisfaction, and social anxiety. Digital self-control and subjective digital literacy positively predicted digital well-being. Digital self-control also predicted greater life satisfaction. Finally, digital information ignorance predicted increased life satisfaction and social anxiety. Overall, the current study contributes to a growing literature on digital well-being by exploring its antecedents.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI & Society
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02071-2
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determinants of digital well-being

Erkin Asutay, Lewend Mayiwar, Daniel Västfjäll, Kinga Barrafrem et al.
14 citations
AI & Society
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
15.85
article

Determinants of digital well-being

Erkin Asutay, Lewend Mayiwar, Daniel Västfjäll, Kinga Barrafrem, Gustav Tinghög
article en
14 citations

Abstract

Abstract How can people lead fulfilling lives both thanks to and despite the constant use of digital media and artificial intelligence? While the prevailing narrative often portrays these technologies as generally harmful to well-being, the reality is of course more nuanced—some individuals benefit, while others do not. Existing research has predominantly focused on the general consequences of digital media on well-being, with less attention given to the individual-level antecedents of digital well-being. In the present study, we aimed to identify the traits and characteristics of individuals who use digital tools in ways that promote their well-being. Using a large representative sample from Sweden ( N = 1999), we explore how digital self-control, digital literacy (objective and subjective), and digital information ignorance predict digital well-being, life satisfaction, and social anxiety. Digital self-control and subjective digital literacy positively predicted digital well-being. Digital self-control also predicted greater life satisfaction. Finally, digital information ignorance predicted increased life satisfaction and social anxiety. Overall, the current study contributes to a growing literature on digital well-being by exploring its antecedents.

AI & SocietyVol. 40(4)
Linköping University (SE), OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), Decision Research (US)
Linköpings Universitet, Handelsrådet, Marcus och Amalia Wallenbergs minnesfond
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
15.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Determinants of digital well-being — Erkin Asutay, Lewend Mayiwar, et al. · AI & Society (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS