Debonding behavior of non-welded wrapped composite X-joints subjected to monotonic tensile load – Numerical study and validation

The dominant failure mode in the non-welded wrapped composite joints made with GFRP composite material wrapped around steel circular hollow sections (CHS) is characterized as interface debonding. However, in the ultimate load joint experiments, debonding process was merely inferred from the surface strain distribution obtained by the digital image correlation (DIC). A thorough understanding and explicit illustration of debonding mechanism in wrapped composite X-joints is needed with help of finite element modeling (FEM), in order to provide prediction models for design of wrapped composite joints in engineering structures. In this paper, two FE models were developed to simulate the debonding behavior of small-scale and medium-scale wrapped composite 45° X-joints in monotonic tensile tests previously conducted by the authors. A new strategy of modeling complex composite geometry using 4-node tetrahedral elements (C3D4) without defining composite lay-up was proposed. The cohesive zone modeling (CZM) approach was utilized to simulate the debonding behavior of composite-steel interface with introduction of a new four-linear traction-separation law. The generated FE models were validated by good agreement between numerical and experimental results in terms of load-displacement response and surface strain distribution throughout the failure process at two joint scales. The validated models gained good insight into the joint debonding mechanism and determined the surface strain threshold for quantifying the debonding length. Development and validation of the FE models with unique set of parameters aligned well with the experiment results at two different scales is an important step for prediction and design of wrapped composite joints. • Cohesive zone model to simulate debonding of the complex interface. • Anisotropic plasticity model to equivalently simulate the softening behavior of composites. • Finte element model with the unique set of parameters matches well to the tests at two-scales. • Design recommendations for joint resistance based on simple mechanical-based formula.