Assessing the Reliability and Validity of the Measures for Automatic Text Summarization

Automatic Text Summarization (ATS) is a research area that originated in the late 1950s and has gained increasing importance with the surging amount of text data available today. One of the key challenges in this area is how to quantitatively assess the quality of the summaries produced. The three most widely quantitative measures used for this task are: ROUGE, BLEU and BERTScore. This paper attempts to comparatively evaluate the validity and reliability of such measures. The concept of Shannon' entropy from information theory served as background for this work. Experiments were conducted using the CNN corpus, focusing on news articles written in English.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3685650.3685671
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the Reliability and Validity of the Measures for Automatic Text Summarization

Steve Simske, Rafael Dueire Lins, Hilário Oliveira
2 citations
Topic Modeling
0.69
article

Assessing the Reliability and Validity of the Measures for Automatic Text Summarization

Steve Simske, Rafael Dueire Lins, Hilário Oliveira
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Automatic Text Summarization (ATS) is a research area that originated in the late 1950s and has gained increasing importance with the surging amount of text data available today. One of the key challenges in this area is how to quantitatively assess the quality of the summaries produced. The three most widely quantitative measures used for this task are: ROUGE, BLEU and BERTScore. This paper attempts to comparatively evaluate the validity and reliability of such measures. The concept of Shannon' entropy from information theory served as background for this work. Experiments were conducted using the CNN corpus, focusing on news articles written in English.

Instituto Federal do Espírito Santo (BR), Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (BR), Colorado State University (US)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Topic Modeling
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.