When to Explain? Exploring the Effects of Explanation Timing on User Perceptions and Trust in AI systems

Explanations are believed to aid understanding of AI models, but do they affect users’ perceptions and trust in AI, especially in the presence of algorithmic bias? If so, when should explanations be provided to optimally balance explainability and usability? To answer these questions, we conducted a user study (N = 303) exploring how explanation timing influences users’ perception of trust calibration, understanding of the AI system, and user experience and user interface satisfaction under both biased and unbiased AI performance conditions. We found that pre-explanations seem most valuable when the AI shows bias in its performance, whereas post-explanations appear more favorable when the system is bias-free. Showing both pre-and post-explanations tends to result in higher perceived trust calibration regardless of bias, despite concerns about content redundancy. Implications for designing socially responsible, explainable, and trustworthy AI interfaces are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3686038.3686066
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When to Explain? Exploring the Effects of Explanation Timing on User Perceptions and Trust in AI systems

S. Shyam Sundar, Cheng Chen, Mengqi Liao
6 citations
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
3.16
article

When to Explain? Exploring the Effects of Explanation Timing on User Perceptions and Trust in AI systems

S. Shyam Sundar, Cheng Chen, Mengqi Liao
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Explanations are believed to aid understanding of AI models, but do they affect users’ perceptions and trust in AI, especially in the presence of algorithmic bias? If so, when should explanations be provided to optimally balance explainability and usability? To answer these questions, we conducted a user study (N = 303) exploring how explanation timing influences users’ perception of trust calibration, understanding of the AI system, and user experience and user interface satisfaction under both biased and unbiased AI performance conditions. We found that pre-explanations seem most valuable when the AI shows bias in its performance, whereas post-explanations appear more favorable when the system is bias-free. Showing both pre-and post-explanations tends to result in higher perceived trust calibration regardless of bias, despite concerns about content redundancy. Implications for designing socially responsible, explainable, and trustworthy AI interfaces are discussed.

Grady Memorial Hospital (US), Pennsylvania State University (US), University of Georgia (US), Elon University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
3.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.