Human-Robot Interaction Experiment: Minor Changes; Significant Differences

Designing successful human-robot interaction (HRI) experiments is a complex and challenging task for researchers, with no comprehensive guides or established best practices available to navigate this intricate process. The field of HRI often involves trial and error, resulting in numerous unsuccessful experiments or witnessing colleagues’ struggles in testing their hypotheses. In this paper, we outline the rigorous two-and-a-half-year journey of our team in developing a successful human-robot trust experiment. We designed a 2D search task in which a human and a robot collaborated to achieve a higher team score. The only requirement for effective collaboration was trust, which was challenging to maintain given the robot’s varying reliability. In this paper, we present three of our most significant experiment designs, discussing the outcomes of each, the reasons behind the initial failures, and the modifications implemented at each stage. The designed game can be conducted remotely or in person, with optional supplementary measures. Our insights aim to contribute to the body of knowledge in HRI experiment design, offering practical guidance and lessons learned for future research endeavors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3686038.3686056
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human-Robot Interaction Experiment: Minor Changes; Significant Differences

Paul Robinette, Zahra Rezaei Khavas
2 citations
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
1.29
article

Human-Robot Interaction Experiment: Minor Changes; Significant Differences

Paul Robinette, Zahra Rezaei Khavas
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Designing successful human-robot interaction (HRI) experiments is a complex and challenging task for researchers, with no comprehensive guides or established best practices available to navigate this intricate process. The field of HRI often involves trial and error, resulting in numerous unsuccessful experiments or witnessing colleagues’ struggles in testing their hypotheses. In this paper, we outline the rigorous two-and-a-half-year journey of our team in developing a successful human-robot trust experiment. We designed a 2D search task in which a human and a robot collaborated to achieve a higher team score. The only requirement for effective collaboration was trust, which was challenging to maintain given the robot’s varying reliability. In this paper, we present three of our most significant experiment designs, discussing the outcomes of each, the reasons behind the initial failures, and the modifications implemented at each stage. The designed game can be conducted remotely or in person, with optional supplementary measures. Our insights aim to contribute to the body of knowledge in HRI experiment design, offering practical guidance and lessons learned for future research endeavors.

University of Massachusetts Lowell (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Human-Robot Interaction Experiment: Minor Changes; Significant Differences — Paul Robinette, Zahra Rezaei Khavas · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS