Encoding Social & Ethical Values in Autonomous Navigation: Philosophies Behind an Interactive Online Demonstration

Autonomous Systems (ASs) interacting with human societies raises complex social & ethical challenges. This paper argues that one way of scaffolding human trust in ASs is through the encoding of ethical, legal and social impact (ELSI) considerations in the ASs’ decision-making processes. Existing ELSI-encoding efforts often focus on the implementation of rule-based and risk-based approaches, leaving key questions unanswered - what are the relationships between ELSI-encoding software logic in ASs and human ethical practises; what ethical approaches cannot be easily translated into software rules and numeric risks; and what are the implications of this for ethical AS?

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3686038.3686044
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Encoding Social & Ethical Values in Autonomous Navigation: Philosophies Behind an Interactive Online Demonstration

Luke Moffat, Yun Tang, Joe Deville, Weisi Guo et al.
3 citations
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
1.58
article

Encoding Social & Ethical Values in Autonomous Navigation: Philosophies Behind an Interactive Online Demonstration

Luke Moffat, Yun Tang, Joe Deville, Weisi Guo, Corinne May‐Chahal, Antonios Tsourdos
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Autonomous Systems (ASs) interacting with human societies raises complex social & ethical challenges. This paper argues that one way of scaffolding human trust in ASs is through the encoding of ethical, legal and social impact (ELSI) considerations in the ASs’ decision-making processes. Existing ELSI-encoding efforts often focus on the implementation of rule-based and risk-based approaches, leaving key questions unanswered - what are the relationships between ELSI-encoding software logic in ASs and human ethical practises; what ethical approaches cannot be easily translated into software rules and numeric risks; and what are the implications of this for ethical AS?

Lancaster University (GB), Cranfield University (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
1.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Encoding Social & Ethical Values in Autonomous Navigation: Philosophies Behind an Interactive Online Demonstration — Luke Moffat, Yun Tang, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS