Anagrammatical Time: on the Grammar of Temporal Harm in the Afterlife of Slavery
Abstract In this paper, I argue that lived time is anagrammatical. Anagrammatical time is a time that lands differently along race/gender/class lines. Its sens – its grammar – is rearranged by the context of its unfolding, at times effecting temporal harm while, at others, offering paths for temporal freedom. After introducing the notion of anagrammatical in part 1, in part 2, I turn to Merleau-Ponty’s notions of Stiftung and virtuality to account for the “nestedness” of anagrammatical time. The past and present of anagrammatical time, I show, co-exist in the present diachronically. In part 3, I focus on temporal harm. I show how, in the context of the afterlife of slavery, the immemorial functions as a traumatic, compulsive-repetitive temporality, as a thief of time temporalizing with the felt necessity and determinacy of the future anterior . In part 4, I briefly turn to the temporal grammar of the “could have been” to think through temporal freedom.
Authors
- Martina Ferrari (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5654-7396)
Institutions
- Villanova University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Research in Phenomenology
- Published
- 2024-09-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1163/15691640-12341554
- Primary Topic
- Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00