Trading in the Quantum Era: optimizing Bitcoin gains and energy costs

This paper presents an in-depth analysis of a Quantum-inspired Multi-objective Optimization Algorithm (QMOA) applied to a unique problem: maximizing trading profits while minimizing energy costs. Previous investigations have explored the profitability of Bitcoin, yet our research delves into its relationship with energy costs. Regarding the trade-offs, the Pareto analysis reveals that trading profit and energy cost do not strongly inversely correlate. The range of outcomes shows a relatively uniform trading profit (from 1.302, 85 to 1.310, 22$), but a broader variation in energy costs (from 1.141, 66 to 5.657, 94$). While the trading profit remains stable, there is a wide array of options for minimizing energy cost, which is influenced by various constraints and market conditions. Solutions tend to cluster more in areas of higher energy costs. However, the variability in energy costs offers Bitcoin miners choices, allowing them to tailor strategies, whether that involves prioritizing energy efficiency, profit maximization or striking a balance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Economics
Published
2024-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2024.2404795
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trading in the Quantum Era: optimizing Bitcoin gains and energy costs

Simona‐Vasilica Oprea, Cristian Bucur, Niculae Oprea, Adela Bârã et al.
3 citations
Journal of Applied Economics
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
2.34
article

Trading in the Quantum Era: optimizing Bitcoin gains and energy costs

Simona‐Vasilica Oprea, Cristian Bucur, Niculae Oprea, Adela Bârã, Bogdan-George Tudorică
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This paper presents an in-depth analysis of a Quantum-inspired Multi-objective Optimization Algorithm (QMOA) applied to a unique problem: maximizing trading profits while minimizing energy costs. Previous investigations have explored the profitability of Bitcoin, yet our research delves into its relationship with energy costs. Regarding the trade-offs, the Pareto analysis reveals that trading profit and energy cost do not strongly inversely correlate. The range of outcomes shows a relatively uniform trading profit (from 1.302, 85 to 1.310, 22$), but a broader variation in energy costs (from 1.141, 66 to 5.657, 94$). While the trading profit remains stable, there is a wide array of options for minimizing energy cost, which is influenced by various constraints and market conditions. Solutions tend to cluster more in areas of higher energy costs. However, the variability in energy costs offers Bitcoin miners choices, allowing them to tailor strategies, whether that involves prioritizing energy efficiency, profit maximization or striking a balance.

Journal of Applied EconomicsVol. 27(1)
Petroleum & Gas University of Ploieşti (RO), Universitatea Națională de Știință și Tehnologie Politehnica București (RO), Bucharest University of Economic Studies (RO)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
2.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Trading in the Quantum Era: optimizing Bitcoin gains and energy costs — Simona‐Vasilica Oprea, Cristian Bucur, et al. · Journal of Applied Economics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS