Political entrepreneurs and interest groups in the CPTPP ratification process in Chile: A case of politicization?

Abstract This study examines the strategies employed by Chilean political parties and interest groups to politicize the Trans‐Pacific Partnership (CPTPP). To achieve this goal, political entrepreneurs and anti‐trade lobbies opposed the CPTPP are using a distinct strategy to shape the debate. The idea of trade politicization helps understand how these key actors expanded the scope of topics, mobilizing political action from various groups such as environmentalists, unions, indigenous activists, and advocates for gender equality. Furthermore, this strategy involves shifting the discourse away from the traditional dichotomy of free trade versus protectionism and redirecting the debate toward ideological and cultural dimensions such as legitimacy and sovereignty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Affairs
Published
2024-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/waf2.12042
Citations
3
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Political entrepreneurs and interest groups in the CPTPP ratification process in Chile: A case of politicization?

Simón Lodato, Dorotea López, Andrés Dockendorff
3 citations
World Affairs
International Development and Aid
4.21
article

Political entrepreneurs and interest groups in the CPTPP ratification process in Chile: A case of politicization?

Simón Lodato, Dorotea López, Andrés Dockendorff
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study examines the strategies employed by Chilean political parties and interest groups to politicize the Trans‐Pacific Partnership (CPTPP). To achieve this goal, political entrepreneurs and anti‐trade lobbies opposed the CPTPP are using a distinct strategy to shape the debate. The idea of trade politicization helps understand how these key actors expanded the scope of topics, mobilizing political action from various groups such as environmentalists, unions, indigenous activists, and advocates for gender equality. Furthermore, this strategy involves shifting the discourse away from the traditional dichotomy of free trade versus protectionism and redirecting the debate toward ideological and cultural dimensions such as legitimacy and sovereignty.

World AffairsVol. 187(4)
Middlesex University London (GB), University of Chile (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
International Development and Aid
4.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.