Global environmental sustainability trends: A temporal comparison using a new interval-based composite indicator

Assessing progress on the pursuit of the Sustainable Development Goals is crucial for evaluating the sustainability of a Country, although this is not easy, considering the interdependencies or interconnections of individual goals with others, and the fact that there are several indicators for each goal. The aims of this research are: (1) to propose a novel interval-based environmental sustainable composite index (ESI) suitable to monitor the worldwide environmental SDGs' implementation at national scale, (2) to solve the problem of missing data in large databases and the subjectivity in computing a composite index (CI), (3) to group and compare statistically countries according to the ESI, and (4) to represent spatially the results to identify areas of the world more or less environmentally sustainable than others. Clustering and Sankey diagrams have supported the temporal and spatial analysis of ESI trends, showing that Canada, Brazil, New Zealand, and several European countries have been the most sustainable in 2019. The novelty of this indicator is that each country presents an ESI central value, the most probable value of the composite indicator, and a range, which represents the uncertainty given by the lower and upper bounds. In this sense, it is possible to better interpret the results of the composite indicator, while simultaneously obtaining a measure of the uncertainty of the results. The composite indicator can be used to monitor countries’ vulnerability towards the unsustainability risk, as well as countries that are not able to escape from a sort of “unsustainability trap”. • The most sustainable are the European countries with Canada, New Zealand, and Brazil. • The least sustainable are Africa, India, Afghanistan, and Persian Gulf countries. • The Environmental Composite Indicators are presented through interval parameters. • Cluster analysis of mean values of center variables identified four different clusters. • Cluster 3 groups all the countries with a positive trends towards sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2024.100482
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global environmental sustainability trends: A temporal comparison using a new interval-based composite indicator

Erica Maria Lovello, Carlo Drago, Donatella Valente, Irene Petrosillo et al.
12 citations
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Climate Change Policy and Economics
13.55
article

Global environmental sustainability trends: A temporal comparison using a new interval-based composite indicator

Erica Maria Lovello, Carlo Drago, Donatella Valente, Irene Petrosillo, Cosimo Magazzino
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Assessing progress on the pursuit of the Sustainable Development Goals is crucial for evaluating the sustainability of a Country, although this is not easy, considering the interdependencies or interconnections of individual goals with others, and the fact that there are several indicators for each goal. The aims of this research are: (1) to propose a novel interval-based environmental sustainable composite index (ESI) suitable to monitor the worldwide environmental SDGs' implementation at national scale, (2) to solve the problem of missing data in large databases and the subjectivity in computing a composite index (CI), (3) to group and compare statistically countries according to the ESI, and (4) to represent spatially the results to identify areas of the world more or less environmentally sustainable than others. Clustering and Sankey diagrams have supported the temporal and spatial analysis of ESI trends, showing that Canada, Brazil, New Zealand, and several European countries have been the most sustainable in 2019. The novelty of this indicator is that each country presents an ESI central value, the most probable value of the composite indicator, and a range, which represents the uncertainty given by the lower and upper bounds. In this sense, it is possible to better interpret the results of the composite indicator, while simultaneously obtaining a measure of the uncertainty of the results. The composite indicator can be used to monitor countries’ vulnerability towards the unsustainability risk, as well as countries that are not able to escape from a sort of “unsustainability trap”. • The most sustainable are the European countries with Canada, New Zealand, and Brazil. • The least sustainable are Africa, India, Afghanistan, and Persian Gulf countries. • The Environmental Composite Indicators are presented through interval parameters. • Cluster analysis of mean values of center variables identified four different clusters. • Cluster 3 groups all the countries with a positive trends towards sustainability.

Environmental and Sustainability IndicatorsVol. 24
Roma Tre University (IT), University of Salento (IT), Western Caspian University (AZ), University Niccolò Cusano (IT), University of Palermo (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
13.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.