Comprehensive examination of intellectual property objects: problematic issues in the context of science and technology development

The article is devoted to the study of a number of problematic aspects related tocomprehensive examinations of intellectual property objects in the context of scienceand technology development.It is established that intellectual property objects created with the help of artificial intelligenceare characterized by a complex legal nature. Thus, a particular work may be entirelygenerated by an artificial intelligence system. In this regard, there is a need to appointcomprehensive examinations for their study in the course of consideration of themerits of cases on the protection of intellectual property rights, within which it will be necessaryto apply both knowledge in the field of intellectual property and technical knowledgerelated to the peculiarities of creating these works.The author identifies the need to adapt existing methods to new intellectual propertyobjects, as well as to develop modern research methods taking into account the specifics ofthe legal nature of such objects. Given the complex legal nature of intellectual property objectscreated with the use of artificial intelligence, the author proposes to appoint a comprehensiveexamination with the involvement of technical specialists.It is noted that a comprehensive examination of intellectual property involves a multi-levelstudy, which, however, forms an interdependent logical sequence of activities of individual experts.In this case, the key is the impossibility of establishing the properties of a particular intellectualproperty object without conducting a study by an expert of another specialization.It is noted that when an intellectual property object has a dualistic legal nature, thereis a need to integrate various areas of knowledge in the field of intellectual property. Despitethe fact that this knowledge relates to the field of intellectual property, such a studywill be complex in its procedural nature.It is summarized that various subtypes of intellectual property expertise may require technicalassistance to solve the tasks assigned to the expert, especially in the context of the developmentof digital technologies and their use for the creation of new intellectual property objects.