Development of the Ionospheric E‐Region Prompt Radio Occultation Based Electron Density (E‐PROBED) Model

Abstract This work reports the development of the first version of the E‐region Prompt Radio Occultation Based Electron Density (E‐PROBED) Model. This is an empirical model of E‐region electron density (Ne) between 90 and 120 km developed using radio occultation measurements from the COSMIC‐1 mission. This first version captures more than 80% of the observed variability in monthly‐mean latitude‐local time‐altitude E‐region Ne profiles but it does not account for longitudinal variability at constant local‐time. This work also reports a validation of E‐PROBED simulations through comparisons with ionosondes and incoherent scatter radar (ISR) E‐region Ne profiles. E‐PROBED generally agrees with these ground‐based observations during day‐time. During night‐time, there is a large disparity between E‐PROBED and ISR values. Finally, this work compares E‐PROBED with E‐region Ne simulated by the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI) and the Specified Dynamics—Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model with Ionosphere/Thermosphere eXtension (SD‐WACCM‐X). One of the main differences amongst these models is on the simulation of variabilities that cannot be attributed to photoionization. IRI barely simulates any variability not driven by photoionization. Both E‐PROBED and SD‐WACCM‐X simulates variability not driven by photoionization. Another main difference is in the absolute magnitude of night‐time E‐region Ne values. Both IRI and SD‐WACCM‐X are substantially lower than E‐PROBED. This work first concludes that E‐PROBED can conveniently provide E‐region Ne latitude—local time variabilities and structures that COSMIC‐1 observes. This work also concludes that E‐region Ne have significant non‐photoionization driven variabilities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Space Weather
Published
2024-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024sw004037
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of the Ionospheric E‐Region Prompt Radio Occultation Based Electron Density (E‐PROBED) Model

Dong L. Wu, Cornelius Csar Jude H. Salinas, Liying Qian, Nimalan Swarnalingam et al.
2 citations
Space Weather
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
0.66
article

Development of the Ionospheric E‐Region Prompt Radio Occultation Based Electron Density (E‐PROBED) Model

Dong L. Wu, Cornelius Csar Jude H. Salinas, Liying Qian, Nimalan Swarnalingam, Daniel J. Emmons
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This work reports the development of the first version of the E‐region Prompt Radio Occultation Based Electron Density (E‐PROBED) Model. This is an empirical model of E‐region electron density (Ne) between 90 and 120 km developed using radio occultation measurements from the COSMIC‐1 mission. This first version captures more than 80% of the observed variability in monthly‐mean latitude‐local time‐altitude E‐region Ne profiles but it does not account for longitudinal variability at constant local‐time. This work also reports a validation of E‐PROBED simulations through comparisons with ionosondes and incoherent scatter radar (ISR) E‐region Ne profiles. E‐PROBED generally agrees with these ground‐based observations during day‐time. During night‐time, there is a large disparity between E‐PROBED and ISR values. Finally, this work compares E‐PROBED with E‐region Ne simulated by the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI) and the Specified Dynamics—Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model with Ionosphere/Thermosphere eXtension (SD‐WACCM‐X). One of the main differences amongst these models is on the simulation of variabilities that cannot be attributed to photoionization. IRI barely simulates any variability not driven by photoionization. Both E‐PROBED and SD‐WACCM‐X simulates variability not driven by photoionization. Another main difference is in the absolute magnitude of night‐time E‐region Ne values. Both IRI and SD‐WACCM‐X are substantially lower than E‐PROBED. This work first concludes that E‐PROBED can conveniently provide E‐region Ne latitude—local time variabilities and structures that COSMIC‐1 observes. This work also concludes that E‐region Ne have significant non‐photoionization driven variabilities.

Space WeatherVol. 22(9)
NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US), NSF NCAR High Altitude Observatory (US), University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Goddard Space Flight Center (US), University of America (US), U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology (US), University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US), Catholic University of America (US)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Computational and Information Systems Laboratory, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, Goddard Space Flight Center
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
0.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.