Comparison Between Ketamine and Dexmedetomidine in Achieving Opioid Sparing Sedoanalgesia in Patients Following Open Heart Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Opioid-sparing sedoanalgesia relies on non-opioid multimodal analgesic and sedative agents. It is being developed to decrease or eliminate opioid use for the management of acute postoperative pain to avoid opioid complications. This study aimed to compare ketamine and dexmedetomidine for their efficiency and safety in inducing opioid-sparing sedoanalgesia in patients following open heart surgery. Methods: Ninety adult cardiac patients who underwent open heart surgery were enrolled. They were randomly divided into three groups. Group D received a dexmedetomidine infusion of 0.1– 0.2 μg/kg/hour, group K received a ketamine infusion of 1–2 μg/kg/min while group C received a placebo as a control group. Drugs were given after the operation in the surgical intensive care unit. Total postoperative opioid consumption was the primary outcome. Richmond agitation sedation scale, visual analog pain scale, time to first analgesic request, patient satisfaction, and incidence of any complications were recorded. Results: In this study, we found that the median (interquartile range) postoperative opioid consumption was significantly lower in groups D and K than in group C (156 (40), 140 (83), 185 (110); p < 0.001). Richmond agitation sedation scale was statistically significant until 6 hours postoperative (p-value: < 0.05). Patient satisfaction score was higher in groups D and K than in group C (p-value: 0.005). On the other side, there is no statistically significant difference between the three study groups regarding time to first analgesic request (minutes) (p-value: 0.064) or visual analog pain scale (p-value: > 0.05). Incidence of complications was highly significant between the study groups (p-value: < 0.001). Conclusions: To decrease postoperative opioid use with their multiple side effects and improve patient satisfaction scores in patients undergoing open heart surgery under general anesthesia, the use of either ketamine or dexmedetomidine is recommended in the postoperative period as an adjuvant modality and a good idea with observation of possibility of some preventable side effects.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Anesthesia & Pain Research
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-846x.1089
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison Between Ketamine and Dexmedetomidine in Achieving Opioid Sparing Sedoanalgesia in Patients Following Open Heart Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Mohamed Ahmed Hamed, Mohamed Ahmed Shawky, Omar Sayed Fargaly, Mohammad Fouad Algyar et al.
1 citations
Anesthesia & Pain Research
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
0.64
article

Comparison Between Ketamine and Dexmedetomidine in Achieving Opioid Sparing Sedoanalgesia in Patients Following Open Heart Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Mohamed Ahmed Hamed, Mohamed Ahmed Shawky, Omar Sayed Fargaly, Mohammad Fouad Algyar, Mahdy Ahmed Abdelhady, Abeer Shaban Goda, Mina Mahrous Sobhy, Ahmed Aldemerdash, Rana Ahmed Abdelghaffar, Mostafa Mohammed Elhamamsy, Yasser Salem Mostafa, Ismail Sayed Aldeab, Alyaa Abdel Sattar Mohammed Hassan, Walid Saad Taha, Mohamed Hasan Ragab
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Opioid-sparing sedoanalgesia relies on non-opioid multimodal analgesic and sedative agents. It is being developed to decrease or eliminate opioid use for the management of acute postoperative pain to avoid opioid complications. This study aimed to compare ketamine and dexmedetomidine for their efficiency and safety in inducing opioid-sparing sedoanalgesia in patients following open heart surgery. Methods: Ninety adult cardiac patients who underwent open heart surgery were enrolled. They were randomly divided into three groups. Group D received a dexmedetomidine infusion of 0.1– 0.2 μg/kg/hour, group K received a ketamine infusion of 1–2 μg/kg/min while group C received a placebo as a control group. Drugs were given after the operation in the surgical intensive care unit. Total postoperative opioid consumption was the primary outcome. Richmond agitation sedation scale, visual analog pain scale, time to first analgesic request, patient satisfaction, and incidence of any complications were recorded. Results: In this study, we found that the median (interquartile range) postoperative opioid consumption was significantly lower in groups D and K than in group C (156 (40), 140 (83), 185 (110); p < 0.001). Richmond agitation sedation scale was statistically significant until 6 hours postoperative (p-value: < 0.05). Patient satisfaction score was higher in groups D and K than in group C (p-value: 0.005). On the other side, there is no statistically significant difference between the three study groups regarding time to first analgesic request (minutes) (p-value: 0.064) or visual analog pain scale (p-value: > 0.05). Incidence of complications was highly significant between the study groups (p-value: < 0.001). Conclusions: To decrease postoperative opioid use with their multiple side effects and improve patient satisfaction scores in patients undergoing open heart surgery under general anesthesia, the use of either ketamine or dexmedetomidine is recommended in the postoperative period as an adjuvant modality and a good idea with observation of possibility of some preventable side effects.

Anesthesia & Pain ResearchVol. 8(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.