Addressing diversity, equity, and inclusion in library and information science curriculum: Looking back and to the future

This study emphasizes the importance of library and information science (LIS) educators drawing insights from practitioners’ lived experiences, particularly considering perspectives of former students’ experiences when navigating the Master of Library Science (MLS) curriculum. Acknowledging the constructivist underpinnings of learning, with a focus on Schema Theory, is imperative for LIS faculty to learn more about how students perceived their past curriculum. Challenges occur when students lack the necessary schemata to comprehend unfamiliar concepts, particularly in areas like diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Given the lack of diversity amongst the faculty population in LIS, faculty must navigate this discrepancy, recognizing the potential mismatch between their own life experiences, those of their student body, and the diverse patrons of varying genders, races, sexualities, income levels, locations, and abilities that libraries and librarians aim to serve. To address this, educators should not only activate existing student schema but also guide them in constructing new schemas, especially when delving into unfamiliar DEI topics. This study employed an explanatory sequential mixed methods design, involving 190 participants who responded to a survey. Additionally, 26 participants completed interviews. Following Creswell and Plano Clark’s approach, this design allowed for a quantitative phase to gather data, followed by a qualitative phase to further contextualize the quantitative results. The findings offer valuable insights into DEI education and the challenges faced by LIS educators in promoting meaningful learning experiences to prepare students to work with all library patrons.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
Published
2024-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006241279471
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Library Science and Administration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing diversity, equity, and inclusion in library and information science curriculum: Looking back and to the future

Holly Hebert, René Burress, Xiaofeng Li
6 citations
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
Library Science and Administration
15.24
article

Addressing diversity, equity, and inclusion in library and information science curriculum: Looking back and to the future

Holly Hebert, René Burress, Xiaofeng Li
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This study emphasizes the importance of library and information science (LIS) educators drawing insights from practitioners’ lived experiences, particularly considering perspectives of former students’ experiences when navigating the Master of Library Science (MLS) curriculum. Acknowledging the constructivist underpinnings of learning, with a focus on Schema Theory, is imperative for LIS faculty to learn more about how students perceived their past curriculum. Challenges occur when students lack the necessary schemata to comprehend unfamiliar concepts, particularly in areas like diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Given the lack of diversity amongst the faculty population in LIS, faculty must navigate this discrepancy, recognizing the potential mismatch between their own life experiences, those of their student body, and the diverse patrons of varying genders, races, sexualities, income levels, locations, and abilities that libraries and librarians aim to serve. To address this, educators should not only activate existing student schema but also guide them in constructing new schemas, especially when delving into unfamiliar DEI topics. This study employed an explanatory sequential mixed methods design, involving 190 participants who responded to a survey. Additionally, 26 participants completed interviews. Following Creswell and Plano Clark’s approach, this design allowed for a quantitative phase to gather data, followed by a qualitative phase to further contextualize the quantitative results. The findings offer valuable insights into DEI education and the challenges faced by LIS educators in promoting meaningful learning experiences to prepare students to work with all library patrons.

Journal of Librarianship and Information ScienceVol. 57(4)
Middle Tennessee State University (US), Western Pennsylvania Hospital (US), University of Central Missouri (US), Western University of Health Sciences (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Library Science and Administration
15.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.