Generative AI in Marketing: Promises, Perils, and Public Policy Implications

By evaluating the pattern of generative AI (GAI) use by businesses in marketing, this study aims to understand the subsequent impact on society and develop policy implications that promote its beneficial use. To this end, the authors develop an organizing framework that contends that the usage of GAI models by businesses for marketing purposes creates promises and perils for society through a specific business process. This business process is represented by the action → capabilities → transformation → impact link in the proposed framework. Additionally, the authors find that the level of technology infrastructure, skilled personnel, and data access moderates the influence of GAI on businesses’ ability to develop technology-driven capabilities. Furthermore, adaptive leadership and management strategies moderate the impact of these capabilities on technology-enabled business transformations. This research is the first study to critically evaluate the use of GAI in marketing from a public policy perspective. The study concludes with an agenda for future research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Policy & Marketing
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07439156241286499
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Big Data and Business Intelligence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative AI in Marketing: Promises, Perils, and Public Policy Implications

Philip Kotler, Shaphali Gupta, Bharath Rajan, V. Kumar
15 citations
Journal of Public Policy & Marketing
Big Data and Business Intelligence
7.93
article

Generative AI in Marketing: Promises, Perils, and Public Policy Implications

Philip Kotler, Shaphali Gupta, Bharath Rajan, V. Kumar
article en
15 citations

Abstract

By evaluating the pattern of generative AI (GAI) use by businesses in marketing, this study aims to understand the subsequent impact on society and develop policy implications that promote its beneficial use. To this end, the authors develop an organizing framework that contends that the usage of GAI models by businesses for marketing purposes creates promises and perils for society through a specific business process. This business process is represented by the action → capabilities → transformation → impact link in the proposed framework. Additionally, the authors find that the level of technology infrastructure, skilled personnel, and data access moderates the influence of GAI on businesses’ ability to develop technology-driven capabilities. Furthermore, adaptive leadership and management strategies moderate the impact of these capabilities on technology-enabled business transformations. This research is the first study to critically evaluate the use of GAI in marketing from a public policy perspective. The study concludes with an agenda for future research.

Journal of Public Policy & MarketingVol. 44(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Big Data and Business Intelligence
7.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Generative AI in Marketing: Promises, Perils, and Public Policy Implications — Philip Kotler, Shaphali Gupta, et al. · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS