A 3-Dimensional Morphometric Analysis of 4 Midsagittal Planes for CT Scan Reference Determination in Children with Syndromic Craniosynostosis

ObjectiveTo identify the suitable and practical midsagittal plane (MSP) reference for computed tomography (CT) scan skull analysis in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis.DesignRetrospective study.SettingTertiary referral hospital.Patients and ParticipantsA total of 19 full skull CT scans of syndromic craniosynostosis patients.MethodsSeven craniofacial landmarks located on the midline and 4 MSPs that was previously published and clinically recognized (Planes: SPBaS, SPNSANS, SPLOrPo and SPZFTP) were constructed from the CT images. The absolute distance of every plane from 7 landmarks were then calculated. These distances were subsequently subjected to statistical analysis.Main Outcome Measure(s)The absolute distance of different MSPs from 7 landmarks.ResultsThe distances of landmarks measured to SPBaS were the highest, with the most prominent fluctuation. The fluctuation of the SPNSANS, SPLOrPo and SPZFTP had similar direction changes, with the latter being the closest. Pairwise comparisons demonstrated statistical differences (<i>P </i>< .008 using the Bonferroni correction) between the measured distances of A point (M = 0.25, SD = 0.16) and B point (M = 2.21, SD = 1.6) to SPNSANS. There were statistical significances between distances of B point (M = 1.68, SD = 1.07) and CG point (M = 0.55, SD = 0.37) to SPZFTP plane. There was no statistical significance on each landmark to SPLOrPo.ConclusionsThe study demonstrates that SPBaS is not recommended for MSP reference. While SPNSANS should be carefully selected, the application of SPLOrPo and SPZFTP are interchangeable, with the SPZFTP plane slightly exaggerating the mandible deviation relative to the superior and posterior of the midface.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241286309
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A 3-Dimensional Morphometric Analysis of 4 Midsagittal Planes for CT Scan Reference Determination in Children with Syndromic Craniosynostosis

Norli Anida Abdullah, Norlisah Mohd Ramli, Firdaus Hariri, Lantian Zheng
1 citations
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
0.55
article

A 3-Dimensional Morphometric Analysis of 4 Midsagittal Planes for CT Scan Reference Determination in Children with Syndromic Craniosynostosis

Norli Anida Abdullah, Norlisah Mohd Ramli, Firdaus Hariri, Lantian Zheng
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ObjectiveTo identify the suitable and practical midsagittal plane (MSP) reference for computed tomography (CT) scan skull analysis in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis.DesignRetrospective study.SettingTertiary referral hospital.Patients and ParticipantsA total of 19 full skull CT scans of syndromic craniosynostosis patients.MethodsSeven craniofacial landmarks located on the midline and 4 MSPs that was previously published and clinically recognized (Planes: SPBaS, SPNSANS, SPLOrPo and SPZFTP) were constructed from the CT images. The absolute distance of every plane from 7 landmarks were then calculated. These distances were subsequently subjected to statistical analysis.Main Outcome Measure(s)The absolute distance of different MSPs from 7 landmarks.ResultsThe distances of landmarks measured to SPBaS were the highest, with the most prominent fluctuation. The fluctuation of the SPNSANS, SPLOrPo and SPZFTP had similar direction changes, with the latter being the closest. Pairwise comparisons demonstrated statistical differences (<i>P </i>< .008 using the Bonferroni correction) between the measured distances of A point (M = 0.25, SD = 0.16) and B point (M = 2.21, SD = 1.6) to SPNSANS. There were statistical significances between distances of B point (M = 1.68, SD = 1.07) and CG point (M = 0.55, SD = 0.37) to SPZFTP plane. There was no statistical significance on each landmark to SPLOrPo.ConclusionsThe study demonstrates that SPBaS is not recommended for MSP reference. While SPNSANS should be carefully selected, the application of SPLOrPo and SPZFTP are interchangeable, with the SPZFTP plane slightly exaggerating the mandible deviation relative to the superior and posterior of the midface.

The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial JournalVol. 62(11)
University of Malaya (MY)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
0.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.