Criminal Policy Preferences Among the Public and the Police: A Comparison

Through surveys in Flanders (Belgium), the article investigates the criminal policy preferences of the public and the police, a topic of considerable policy relevance that has so far received limited academic attention. It describes and compares such preferences both for specific crimes, within the realm of the criminal justice (CJ) process, and in general, considering interventions that reflect the broadening scope of contemporary criminal policy. Data from 2,348 citizens and 381 police officers point to the capability of both groups to discriminate, that is, to support different CJ interventions depending on the crimes considered, and shows that, for most crimes, the public backs more lenient interventions than the police. Instead, both groups’ general criminal policy preferences are quite similar.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Criminal Justice Review
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10575677241277108
Primary Topic
Crime Patterns and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Criminal Policy Preferences Among the Public and the Police: A Comparison

Letizia Paoli, Jonas Visschers
International Criminal Justice Review
Crime Patterns and Interventions
article

Criminal Policy Preferences Among the Public and the Police: A Comparison

Letizia Paoli, Jonas Visschers
article en

Abstract

Through surveys in Flanders (Belgium), the article investigates the criminal policy preferences of the public and the police, a topic of considerable policy relevance that has so far received limited academic attention. It describes and compares such preferences both for specific crimes, within the realm of the criminal justice (CJ) process, and in general, considering interventions that reflect the broadening scope of contemporary criminal policy. Data from 2,348 citizens and 381 police officers point to the capability of both groups to discriminate, that is, to support different CJ interventions depending on the crimes considered, and shows that, for most crimes, the public backs more lenient interventions than the police. Instead, both groups’ general criminal policy preferences are quite similar.

International Criminal Justice ReviewVol. 35(3)
Institute of Criminology (SI), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Crime Patterns and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.