Scoping review of the effectiveness of 10 high-impact initiatives (HIIs) for recovering urgent and emergency care services
Effective interventions were often only identifiable as components within the NHS England 10 high-impact initiative groupings. The evidence base remains limited, with substantial heterogeneity in urgent and emergency care initiatives, metrics and reporting across different studies and settings. Future research should focus on well-defined interventions while remaining sensitive to local context.
Authors
- Katherine Jones (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0613-3168)
- Andrew Booth (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4808-3880)
- Anthea Sutton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2449-2516)
- Christopher Carroll (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6361-6182)
- Anastasios Bastounis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5861-9373)
- Carl Marincowitz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3043-7564)
- Steve Goodacre (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0803-8444)
- Burak Kundakci (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3507-1111)
- Amber Muhinyi
Institutions
- University of Sheffield (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMJ Open Quality
- Published
- 2024-09-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002906
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Emergency and Acute Care Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.76
Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research