I’m a Survivor: Political Dynamics in Bureaucratic Elites’ Partisan Identification

This article challenges the common assumption that the partisan identification of bureaucratic elites is fixed over time. Building on principal-agent and organization theory, we hypothesize that bureaucratic elites may respond to political turnover by adjusting their partisan identification toward that of their (new) elected principals. We test this prediction using data from the American State Administrators Project (ASAP) over the 1964–2008 period, which allows us to study the same US agency leaders (N=951 individuals) before and after partisan shifts in their agency’s elected principals. We find significant evidence that agency leaders remaining in office following a shift in the party in power on average reorient their partisan identity in response to such turnover events. These adjustments are stronger for agency leaders directly appointed by, or in more frequent contact with, their elected principals. Our results suggest a malleability of partisanship seldom attributed to bureaucratic elites in public and academic discourse.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Political Science Review
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055424000844
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.16

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

I’m a Survivor: Political Dynamics in Bureaucratic Elites’ Partisan Identification

Per Lægreid, Benny Geys, Zuzana Murdoch, Susan Webb Yackee
5 citations
American Political Science Review
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
11.16
article

I’m a Survivor: Political Dynamics in Bureaucratic Elites’ Partisan Identification

Per Lægreid, Benny Geys, Zuzana Murdoch, Susan Webb Yackee
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This article challenges the common assumption that the partisan identification of bureaucratic elites is fixed over time. Building on principal-agent and organization theory, we hypothesize that bureaucratic elites may respond to political turnover by adjusting their partisan identification toward that of their (new) elected principals. We test this prediction using data from the American State Administrators Project (ASAP) over the 1964–2008 period, which allows us to study the same US agency leaders (N=951 individuals) before and after partisan shifts in their agency’s elected principals. We find significant evidence that agency leaders remaining in office following a shift in the party in power on average reorient their partisan identity in response to such turnover events. These adjustments are stronger for agency leaders directly appointed by, or in more frequent contact with, their elected principals. Our results suggest a malleability of partisanship seldom attributed to bureaucratic elites in public and academic discourse.

American Political Science ReviewVol. 119(3)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), BI Norwegian Business School (NO), University of Bergen (NO)
Auburn University
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
11.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.