Article RETRACTED due to manipulation by the authors Physical education learning outcomes of senior high school students based on gender and intellectual intelligence review

Abstract. This study examined the disparities in Physical Education (PE) learning Outcomes among high school pupils by considering their gender and intellectual aptitude. The study involved participants from a high school in Yogyakarta, selected using the Simple Random Sampling method. The data were then analysed using descriptive statistics and a two-way factorial inferential analysis of variance (ANOVA). The study divided the results into two groups based on their intellectual intelligence: low and high. In the low intellectual category, the average learning outcome for male students was 83.60. Meanwhile, the average for female students was 84.10. In the high intellectual intelligence category, the average results for male students were 85.30, while the average achievement for female students was 83.70. The ANOVA test for the intellectual intelligence variable yielded a p-value (Sig.) of 0.303, which is greater than the significance level of 0.05. This figure suggests that there is no statistically significant difference in students’ learning outcomes based on their level of intelligence, whether low or high. Similarly, the p-value of 0.383 for the gender variable was also greater than the significance level of 0.05, indicating no statistically significant variations in learning results. Additionally, the interaction effect between IQ and gender yielded a significance value of 0.100, which is greater than 0.05. It indicates no significant interaction between these two variables on the learning performance of high school students. The finding means that cognitive intelligence does not have a substantial impact on the performance of physical education (PE) among high school students. Moreover, there is no notable disparity in PE performance between male and female students, suggesting gender equality in both the opportunities and abilities in PE. Finally, the study found no notable correlation between gender and IQ levels in performance on intelligence tasks. These results diminish the importance of considering other criteria, such as physical aptitude, in evaluating PE performance and emphasize the need for comprehensive and inclusive physical education programs. Keywords: Learning Achievement, PE, Students, Adolescents, Gender, Intellectual Intelligence

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Retos
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v60.108990
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Article RETRACTED due to manipulation by the authors Physical education learning outcomes of senior high school students based on gender and intellectual intelligence review

Hilmainur Syampurma, Indri Wulandari, Nurkadri Nurkadri, Aldo Naza Putra et al.
1 citations
Retos
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
0.64
article

Article RETRACTED due to manipulation by the authors Physical education learning outcomes of senior high school students based on gender and intellectual intelligence review

Hilmainur Syampurma, Indri Wulandari, Nurkadri Nurkadri, Aldo Naza Putra, Siti Nurrochmah, Weny Sasmitha, Dessi Novita Sari, Ratko Pavlović, Baskoro Nugroho Putro, Zulbahri Zulbahri, Harmanto Harmanto, Francesco Tafuri, Gusliana HB, Harifah Lawanis
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract. This study examined the disparities in Physical Education (PE) learning Outcomes among high school pupils by considering their gender and intellectual aptitude. The study involved participants from a high school in Yogyakarta, selected using the Simple Random Sampling method. The data were then analysed using descriptive statistics and a two-way factorial inferential analysis of variance (ANOVA). The study divided the results into two groups based on their intellectual intelligence: low and high. In the low intellectual category, the average learning outcome for male students was 83.60. Meanwhile, the average for female students was 84.10. In the high intellectual intelligence category, the average results for male students were 85.30, while the average achievement for female students was 83.70. The ANOVA test for the intellectual intelligence variable yielded a p-value (Sig.) of 0.303, which is greater than the significance level of 0.05. This figure suggests that there is no statistically significant difference in students’ learning outcomes based on their level of intelligence, whether low or high. Similarly, the p-value of 0.383 for the gender variable was also greater than the significance level of 0.05, indicating no statistically significant variations in learning results. Additionally, the interaction effect between IQ and gender yielded a significance value of 0.100, which is greater than 0.05. It indicates no significant interaction between these two variables on the learning performance of high school students. The finding means that cognitive intelligence does not have a substantial impact on the performance of physical education (PE) among high school students. Moreover, there is no notable disparity in PE performance between male and female students, suggesting gender equality in both the opportunities and abilities in PE. Finally, the study found no notable correlation between gender and IQ levels in performance on intelligence tasks. These results diminish the importance of considering other criteria, such as physical aptitude, in evaluating PE performance and emphasize the need for comprehensive and inclusive physical education programs. Keywords: Learning Achievement, PE, Students, Adolescents, Gender, Intellectual Intelligence

RetosVol. 60
State University of Malang (ID), Sebelas Maret University (ID), Yogyakarta State University (ID), University of East Sarajevo (BA), State University of Medan (ID), Universitas Negeri Surabaya (ID), State University of Padang (ID), University Niccolò Cusano (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Emotional Intelligence and Performance
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.