A Robust Governance for the AI Act: AI Office, AI Board, Scientific Panel, and National Authorities

Abstract Regulation is nothing without enforcement. This particularly holds for the dynamic field of emerging technologies. Hence, this article has two ambitions. First, it explains how the EU’s new Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) may be implemented and enforced by various institutional bodies, thus clarifying the governance framework of the AIA. Second, it proposes a normative governance model, providing recommendations to ensure uniform and coordinated execution of the AIA and the fulfillment of the legislation. The article explores how the AIA may be implemented by national and EU institutional bodies, encompassing longstanding bodies, such as the European Commission, and those newly established under the AIA, such as the AI Office. It investigates their roles across supranational and national levels, emphasising how EU regulations influence institutional structures and operations. These regulations may not only directly dictate the structural design of institutions but also indirectly request administrative capacities needed to enforce the AIA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Risk Regulation
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2024.57
Citations
24
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Robust Governance for the AI Act: AI Office, AI Board, Scientific Panel, and National Authorities

Jessica Morley, Philipp Hacker, Luciano Floridi, Jarle Trondal et al.
24 citations
European Journal of Risk Regulation
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
8.34
article

A Robust Governance for the AI Act: AI Office, AI Board, Scientific Panel, and National Authorities

Jessica Morley, Philipp Hacker, Luciano Floridi, Jarle Trondal, Claudio Novelli
article en
24 citations

Abstract

Abstract Regulation is nothing without enforcement. This particularly holds for the dynamic field of emerging technologies. Hence, this article has two ambitions. First, it explains how the EU’s new Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) may be implemented and enforced by various institutional bodies, thus clarifying the governance framework of the AIA. Second, it proposes a normative governance model, providing recommendations to ensure uniform and coordinated execution of the AIA and the fulfillment of the legislation. The article explores how the AIA may be implemented by national and EU institutional bodies, encompassing longstanding bodies, such as the European Commission, and those newly established under the AIA, such as the AI Office. It investigates their roles across supranational and national levels, emphasising how EU regulations influence institutional structures and operations. These regulations may not only directly dictate the structural design of institutions but also indirectly request administrative capacities needed to enforce the AIA.

European Journal of Risk RegulationVol. 16(2)
University of Oslo (NO), University of Agder (NO), European University Viadrina (DE), Yale University (US), GNA University (IN), Institute for the International Education of Students (US), University of Bologna (IT), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Università di Bologna
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
8.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.